Niedrich, Anastasia N.
August 2011
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform;Summer2011, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p1019
Academic Journal
Political speech is vital to a functioning democracy and is highly protected. That much is hardly disputed. What courts, legal scholars, and those seeking to convey a political message do dispute is how political speech should be identified and protected, and who should decide what constitutes political speech. This Note looks at the history of political speech doctrine and critiques two intent-based approaches that have been proposed by First Amendment scholars to define political speech. This Note proposes a solution to many problems inherent in defining, identifying, and protecting political speech within intent-based frameworks, arguing that focusing on intent creates a distinction without a difference and leads to uneven results in similar situations. The proposed solution, which I term the "Substance-based Political Contribution" Approach, focuses on the substance of the speech and the objective contribution it makes to political discourse, rather than focusing solely on the intent of the speaker or actor. This approach finds support in history and precedent, and is based on the Supreme Court's recent decision in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life. An objective approach emphasizing substance rather than intent, such as the Substance-based Political Contribution Approach, will more effectively consider and evaluate free speech rights and First Amendment concerns, providing greater determinacy, preventing unequal results in similar instances of speech or action, and protecting a greater proportion of expressive conduct, to the benefit of all.


Related Articles

  • The Problem With Regulating Political Speech. Penza, Logan // Moderate Voice;6/25/2010, p12 

    The article presents the author's views concerning the problem with regulating political speeches in the U.S. He explores the court case Citizens United v. FCC wherein the Disclose Act was implemented. It mentions that the bill subjects corporations to issue advocacy limits, but specifically...

  • The Right Stuff.  // Scholastic News -- Edition 5/6;9/16/2013, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p4 

    The article discusses how one's basic rights of Americans are protected in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It mentions that the amendment guarantees one's right to voice his or her ideas through various means. It notes that under the First Amendment, Americans are given the right...

  • Government Speech. Curran Jr, J. Joseph // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p7 

    An excerpt from a report by Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. on October 2, 2001 regarding the provision of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibiting Congress of making law abridging the freedom of speech is presented.

  • GOVERNMENT SPEECH.  // Supreme Court Debates;May2015, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p6 

    An excerpt from the report "Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment" is presented.

  • First Amendment/free speech is in the crosshairs. Kolodziej, Elaine // Wilson County News;4/9/2014, p10A 

    The author reflects on the First Amendment to the Constitution of the U.S. which protects the freedom of speech of all Americans in the country.

  • First Amendment provides the muscle.  // Washington Jewish Week;11/19/2015, Vol. 51 Issue 47, p18 

    The author reflects on the U.S. First Amendment and its protection of free-speech rights which is applicable to journalists and demonstrators.

  • QUIZ TIME.  // Syracuse New Times;8/6/2014, Issue 4472, p7 

    A quiz concerning the First Amendment Rights in the U.S. is presented.

  • The Free Speech Jurisprudence of the Rehnquist Court.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1991, Vol. 29, p83 

    An essay is presented on free speech jurisprudence under the leadership of U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist during his 1988-1989 and 1989-1990 U.S. Supreme Court terms. The author states that those observers who criticized Rehnquist Court's jurisprudence for cutting back on individual...

  • Recovering the Freedom of Speech. Haun, William J. // National Affairs;Winter2016, Vol. 26, p82 

    This article focuses on the Freedom of Speech Clause in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Topics covered include the failure of conservatives to recover the founders' notion of protected speech in the Free Speech Clause, the dominant jurisprudence on the Supreme Court with regards to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics