TITLE

Wallis and GHP Securities Ltd v Meredith

AUTHOR(S)
Martin, Rebekah; Mather, Carly; Edminson, Kate; Buckley, James
PUB. DATE
April 2011
SOURCE
Employers Law;Apr2011, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case wherein the British High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for defamation which he filed when he was dismissed by the defendant as a redundant employee based on an exchange of correspondence between the plaintiff and his previous employer's solicitors.
ACCESSION #
65257400

 

Related Articles

  • Defamation: time limits reduced.  // Accountancy;Mar1986, Vol. 97 Issue 1111, p30 

    Reports that the 57th section of the Administration of Justice Act of 1985 in Great Britain changes the time limits for actions for libel and slander. Reduction from six to three years from publication.

  • ONLY IN AMERICA (Cont'd).  // Fortune;12/27/1993, Vol. 128 Issue 16, p141 

    An excerpt from an article published in the "Wall Street Journal" is presented.

  • Owner Not Liable for Defamation Against Former Resident.  // Apartment Building Management Insider;2009, Vol. 23 Issue 13, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a former resident sued the owner and property manager of the apartment that he formerly rented for defamation.

  • Judge throws out suit against editor.  // Advocate;7/8/70, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p22 

    Reports on the dismissal of a complaint of criminal defamation filed by a police official against the editor of the periodical 'Mattachine Midwest,' in Chicago, Illinois. Reason for filing the complaint; Grounds on which the case was dismissed.

  • Takeover panel 'privileged'. Kobrin, David // Accountancy;Feb1981, Vol. 92 Issue 1050, p96 

    Discusses a High Court in Great Britain's ruling on the libel case of Graff v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Case background; Upholding of the Takeover Panel's defense of qualified privilege.

  • NO NAME IS NO DEFENCE. Chandler, Ainslie // BRW;3/11/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p55 

    The article discusses a court case wherein defamation actions were filed against three contributors of the HotCopper investment website by DataMotion Asia Pacific after comments made about the firm's managing director Ronald Moir in Australia.

  • Doctors and defamation.  // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/4/1985, Vol. 290 Issue 6478, p1342 

    Focuses on the important things of defamation actions. Aim to redress injury to reputation; Cause on the action of slander and libel; Defenses of defamation against civil action.

  • Can Deterrence Play a Positive Role in Defamation Law? Erwin, Jonathan Garret // Review of Litigation;Summer2000, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p675 

    Determines whether deterrence plays a positive role in defamation law in the U.S. as of 2000. Common law tort of defamation; Creation of a constitutional tort of defamation; 'New York Times Co. vs. Sullivan'; Ability of injunctions to deter defamatory falsehoods, cure reputational damage, and...

  • Supreme Court Declines To Stop 'Spirit Of Satan' Lawsuit.  // Church & State;Dec2003, Vol. 56 Issue 11, p3 

    An Iowa judge will now decide if the phrase "spirit of Satan" is basis for a slander suit after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene in a dispute at a rural Iowa church. On October 20, 2003, the highest court in the U.S. rejected a petition by the United Methodist Church in Iowa to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics