TITLE

Energy Conservation Means Economic Stagnation

AUTHOR(S)
Freddoso, David
PUB. DATE
April 2002
SOURCE
Human Events;4/29/2002, Vol. 58 Issue 16, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the impact of the legislative bill proposed by U.S. Senators Tom Daschle and Jeff Bingaman, which will not open any of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge or other government-controlled sites for oil drilling. Effect on taxpayers and consumers; Need to create reliable power sources to meet the energy demand caused by future economic expansion; Information on the pollution statistics from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ACCESSION #
6618257

 

Related Articles

  • Point: The Case for Oil Exploration in ANWR. Clouthier, Kris // Points of View: Arctic Drilling;2017, p5 

    This article presents an argument in favor of oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). In the 1980s, when the United States Congress designated the ANWR, it set aside a small coastal section to study its oil potential. Based on studies by the U.S. Geological Survey, it is...

  • The Energy Behind the Energy Fight.  // American Prospect;12/17/2001, Vol. 12 Issue 22, p8 

    Focuses on the highlights of the debate of a U.S. House of Representatives bill that would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil drilling. Implication of the proposed oil drilling for the dependency of the U.S. on foreign oil; Target date for the voting of the bill;

  • House and Senate process rival Energy bills.  // Power Economics;May2003, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p4 

    Reports on the processing of rival energy legislative bills by the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Aim of reducing the energy dependence of the country; Promotion of energy resources; Controversy over the proposed drilling of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

  • Debate.  // Scholastic News -- Edition 4;04/16/2001, Vol. 63 Issue 23, p7 

    Presents a debate on whether Congress should vote for allowing companies to drill oil at the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

  • Nation split sharply on drilling in Arctic. Dillin, John; Savides, Steven // Christian Science Monitor;2/27/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 64, p3 

    Looks at results of a survey to determine whether Americans supported oil production in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

  • LOOKING FOR OIL. Miller, Amy // Junior Scholastic;04/09/2001, Vol. 103 Issue 16, p10 

    Speculates on the fate of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in case of its opening to oil exploration.

  • Green Opposition to Opening ANWR Simply Unfounded. Carlisle, John // Human Events;02/05/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 5, p9 

    Cites the opposition of environmentalists in the United States to the proposed opening of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration. Environmental policies which affected energy consumers; Effect of the lack of refinery capacity; Concerns aired by environmentalists.

  • Push to Drill in Alaska Growing. Daerr, Elizabeth G. // National Parks;May/Jun2001, Vol. 75 Issue 5/6, p11 

    Discusses the plan to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska for oil and gas exploration. Oil demand in the United States; Information on the National Energy Security Act of 2001; Estimated amount of technically recoverable oil within the refuge; Concerns expressed by environmental...

  • Oil exploration can be a boon to Alaskans and environment. Young, Don // Christian Science Monitor;10/13/95, Vol. 87 Issue 223, p18 

    Opinion. Discusses the plans for development of the coastal plain of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) by the Americans. Points to be considered by the US Congress while formulating the plan; Prospects of oil development in Alaska.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics