Rindner, Mark
March 1978
California Law Review;Mar1978, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p282
Academic Journal
Analyzes the ruling of the California Supreme Court on the case People versus Superior Court dealing with constitutionality of prostitution statute of the state. Arguments of the parties to the case; Discriminatory substance in the enforcement of the statute; Facts of the case; Arguments advanced by the Supreme Court in crafting its ruling.


Related Articles

  • First Amendment. M.G.K. // California Law Review;Jan70 part 2, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p154 

    Discusses California Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment in constitutional law as of 1970. Anonymous telephone messages; Licensing of motion picture theaters; Rights of public school teachers; Topless dancing.

  • Fourteenth Amendment. M.L.M. // California Law Review;Jan70 part 2, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p178 

    Discusses California Supreme Court constitutional law cases involving the Fourteenth Amendment. Pretrial civil arrest; Aliens' rights; Pickets on private property.

  • Calif. court rules in favor of PEX piping. DeRosa, Angie // Plastics News;12/23/2002, Vol. 14 Issue 43, p1 

    Focuses on a decision of Superior Court of Los Angeles, California in which they have overturned ruling restrictions on PEX pipe and permits to use cross-linked polyethylene pipes. State agencies involved in the court case; Environmental concerns raised by state's Building Standards Commission.

  • Equality breakthroughs: California court says marriage ban unconstitutional. Jordan, Susan // Empty Closet;Jun2008, Issue 413, p1A 

    The article reports on the decision of the California Supreme Court to overturn a ban on gay marriage as unconstitutional which paves the way for California to become the second state where gay and lesbian residents can legally marry. The ruling should be verified by the secretary of state in a...

  • Legal Briefs.  // HR Specialist;May2013, Vol. 11 Issue 5, p3 

    The article offers news briefs related to labor law in the U.S. in 2013 including the risks of a commission-only pay practice and the rulings for the court cases Furtado v. State Personnel Board and Wanke v. Superior Court, Court of Appeal of California.

  • California Supremes Decline Review of Lease-Leaseback Ruling. Webster, Keeley // Bondbuyer.com;8/28/2015, p1 

    The California Supreme Court declined to review an appeals court's decision on a contested financing method used by Fresno Unified School District.

  • Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Employers in Retaliation Case. Chambers, Heather // San Diego Business Journal;3/24/2008, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p37 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the California Supreme Court in favor of employers in retaliation case Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership. The supreme court ended that individuals could not be held liable in incidents involving workplace retaliation. Moreover, the court held a...

  • See, We Just Don't Want to Get Involved In Politics...  // Advocate;8/23/79, Issue 274, p27 

    Reports on the California State Supreme Court in May regarding Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.'s discrimination against gays.

  • Guard Company Not Liable For Arson. Gold, Lessing E. // SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Apr2000, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p120 

    Focuses on a ruling by the California Supreme Court, which dealt with the liability of a guard company for the arson committed by its employee. Clarification of the licensing requirements of the Business and Professions Code; Private Security Services Act.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics