liar liar pants on fire

Shulman, Polly
August 2002
Popular Science;Aug2002, Vol. 261 Issue 2, p54
Focuses on the efforts of scientists to develop a device that will detect physical signs of deception and lies. Information on the sponsorship by the U.S. Department of Energy of a related study conducted by the National Academy of Sciences; Background on brain-based lie detection technologies, such as the functional magnetic resonance imaging machine and the electroencephalograph; Details on the use of infrared cameras to detect signs of lying through the eyes. INSET: Is foolproof Lie Detection in the Cards?.


Related Articles

  • Exposing the big lie. Bond, Michael // Engineering & Technology (17509637);3/8/2008, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p16 

    Is there a technology for telling whether someone is lying? Michael Bond raises this eternal question and looks at the current options from clairvoyants to latest-generation polygraphs.

  • Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Urgent Need for Regulation. Greely, Henry T.; Illes, Judy // American Journal of Law & Medicine;2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2/3, p377 

    The article examines the historical background of brain-imaging technologies, such as the functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). The test and external conditions regarding the ethical considerations for imaging the brain functions were taken into account. Key information about...

  • LIE to ME. COOK, MICHAEL // Australasian Science;Sep/Oct2010, Vol. 31 Issue 7, p30 

    The article discusses the use of brain scans to determine guilt and innocence in criminal cases. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans are more reliable as compared to a polygraph test because it is measuring truthfulness, not anxiety. In India, a electroencephalogram called Brain...

  • When Pinocchio's nose does not grow: belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception. Sip, Kamila E.; Carmel, David; Marchant, Jennifer L.; Jian Li; Petrovic, Predrag; Roepstorff, Andreas; McGregor, William B.; Frith, Christopher D. // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience;Feb2013, Vol. 7, p1 

    Does the brain activity underlying the production of deception differ depending on whether or not one believes their deception can be detected? To address this question, we had participants commit a mock theft in a laboratory setting, and then interrogated them while they underwent functional...

  • Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges. Farah, Martha J.; Hutchinson, J. Benjamin; Phelps, Elizabeth A.; Wagner, Anthony D. // Nature Reviews Neuroscience;Apr2014, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p278 

    A correction to the article "Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges," that was published in a previous issue is presented.

  • Detecting Infrequent Deception. Murphy, Kevin R. // Journal of Applied Psychology;Nov87, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p611 

    Develops equations showing that extraordinarily high levels of accuracy of polygraph and similar devices would be needed to detect infrequent deception. Debate over the accuracy of deception detection methods; Analysis of the problem of detecting deception in terms of the base rate and the...

  • nowhere to hide. McCrone, John // New Scientist;06/09/2001, Vol. 170 Issue 2294, p24 

    Focuses on the use of the brain reading technology for lie detection in the United States. Controversies associated with the polygraph test; Development of lie detection using brain signals; Information on the use of the electroncephalograph in measuring brain activity.

  • Deceiving the law.  // Nature Neuroscience;Nov2008, Vol. 11 Issue 11, p1231 

    The author reflects on the significance of neuroscience-based lie-detection technology on detecting deception. He presented the case which happened in a court near Mumbai, India which became the first to admit a neuroscience-based lie-detection technique as evidence. He noted that there is no...

  • The Physiological Detection of Deception. Waid, William M.; Orne, Martin T. // American Scientist;Jul/Aug82, Vol. 70 Issue 4, p402 

    Examines the cognitive, social and personality processes involved in the physiological response accompanying deception in line with the accuracy of polygraph tests. Nature of field polygraph testing; Variables affecting the accuracy of polygraph tests; Factors that evoke the physiological...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics