TITLE

LET THE PEOPLE SPEAK: THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO REMOVE CORPORATE SPEECH FROM THE AMBIT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT

AUTHOR(S)
Weissman, Robert
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Temple Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p979
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which dealt with campaign finance. Information is provided on how the decision gave corporations First Amendment protections and allowed corporations to make unlimited amounts of donations to political campaigns to influence elections. The author discusses a constitutional amendment to remove corporate speech rights from the First Amendment.
ACCESSION #
69710605

 

Related Articles

  • Shareholder Rights: Citizens United and Delaware Corporate Governance Law. Miller, Paul S. // Journal of Law & Politics;Fall2012, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p51 

    The article discusses a court case of Citizens United v. FEC based on the First Amendment political speech doctrine of the U.S. Constitution. The issues related to campaign finance reform, its effects on the corporate law and the protection of property rights and political speech rights are...

  • IN VESTED IN POLITICS: GUN JUMPING, CORPORATE POLITICAL SPEECH, AND CITIZENS UNITED. Sanda, Alexander F. L. // Hofstra Law Review;Fall2011, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p309 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which dealt with corporate political speech and campaign finance law in the U.S. Information is provided on securities regulation, the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, and the restriction of corporate...

  • An Unconstitutional Response to Citizens United. Sobelman, Robert B. // Brooklyn Law Review;Fall2011, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p341 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), which dealt with corporate contributions under campaign finance laws. Information is provided on the Court's decision, which included the provision that the U.S. government may not ban or...

  • High Court Eases Corporate Election-Ad Limits. Hunter, Pam // ENR: Engineering News-Record;2/1/2010, Vol. 264 Issue 4, p9 

    The article reports on the mixed reaction of the construction industry to the January 21, 2010 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FCC) which lifts campaign-finance restrictions on corporations. The ruling was considered by some...

  • RECOVERING THE INDIVIDUAL IN POLITICS. Ortiz, Daniel R. // New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy;Spring2012, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p263 

    An essay is presented on the First Amendment law of the U.S. related to the regulation of politics and the free speech clause. The doctrinal and theoretical difficulties facing the individuals and business corporations and the implications in leading election law cases are discussed with...

  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Ribstein, Larry E. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1019 

    The article discusses the debate on corporate governance in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) under the First Amendment of the Constitution in the U.S. It explains Citizens United's support for corporate speech regulation in the context of corporate...

  • CITIZENS UNITED IMPACT ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS.  // Drake Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p685 

    The article presents a panel discussion on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on judicial elections. Topics include campaign finance restrictions, the First Amendment rights of corporations, and how corporate donors...

  • DIVIDING CITIZENS UNITED: THE CASE V. THE CONTROVERSY. Tribe, Laurence H. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p463 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC related to the spending of money by corporations in the elections and use for the prevention of political corruption and its improper influence in the electoral process. It mentions that the decision is based on the First...

  • THE SYSTEM ISN'T BROKEN, IT'S FIXED: ENDING BIG MONEY AND CORPORATIONS IN OUR ELECTIONS. Coleridge, Greg // University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p541 

    In this article the author discusses political influence of large corporations especially in elections campaigns and reflects on the corrupt political process in the U.S. It highlights the need for constitutional amendment regarding constitutional rights and regulation of political spending and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics