TITLE

Ethics Evolution in the Era of Sarbanes-Oxley

AUTHOR(S)
Balog, Ibolya
PUB. DATE
January 2012
SOURCE
Pennsylvania CPA Journal;Winter2012, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the changes in corporate governance with the approaching 10th anniversary of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It states that the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act had been the most important legislation affecting public companies since the securities acts of the 1930s. It cites Sarbanes-Oxley Section 301 which requires audit committees of listed companies to implement processes for receiving, retaining, and addressing complaints to accounting.
ACCESSION #
69726504

 

Related Articles

  • Detecting Fraud. Will the New Rules Help? Sinnett, William M. // Financial Executive;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p63 

    The article refers to corporate fraud, corporate governance, and Section 101 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 101 requires the creation of an independent, non-governmental accounting board to oversee auditing in public companies and protect investors' interests. The Public Company...

  • Corporate Governance in Light of Sarbanes-Oxley and the NYSE Rules. Lipton, Martin; McIntosh, Laura A. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article reports on the new requirements imposed by the New York Stock Exchange due to its adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the corporate governance rules. It discusses the requirements concerning the board of directors, corporate governance and the duties of directors. It...

  • The Audit Committee Oversight Process. BEASLEY, MARK S.; CARCELLO, JOSEPH V.; HERMANSON, DANA R.; NEAL, TERRY L. // Contemporary Accounting Research;Spring2009, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p65 

    Relatively few studies have examined the audit committee oversight process--the activities that link audit committee inputs and financial reporting outcomes. To study this process, we conducted extensive interviews with 42 U.S. public company audit committee members. We explore six audit...

  • Audit Committee Member Support for Proposed Audit Adjustments: Pre-SOX versus Post-SOX Judgments. DeZoort, F. Todd; Hermanson, Dana R.; Houston, Richard W. // Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory;May2008, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p85 

    This study examines differences in audit committee member judgments before the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("pre-SOX") versus after the act was passed ("post- SOX") as well as audit committee member perceptions of the effects of SOX. Based on experimental materials administered to 372 public company...

  • Audit Committee Leaders Face Increasing Workload. Ward, Ralph D. // Financial Executive;Mar2009, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p28 

    The article discusses the responsibilities of corporate audit committee chairs. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 imposed new demands on audit committees and their chairpersons. A study by Spencer Stuart found that committee chairs spend up to 25 hours per month on their duties. Frequently...

  • Governance Imperative: Auditor Choice. Fusco, Cono R. // NACD Directorship;Jun/Jul2007, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p70 

    The article discusses the empowerment of audit committees which emerged from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in the U.S. SOX argues a shift in the profession and financial reporting. The required expanded work of SOX was compounded by an undersupply of capacity. Because of this, audit firms went...

  • Audit Committee Responsibilities Disclosed Since Sarbanes-Oxley. Keinath, Annemarie K.; Walo, Judith C. // CPA Journal;Jun2008, Vol. 78 Issue 6, p32 

    This article discusses a study on the authority given by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to audit committees in overseeing their companies' financial reporting processes in the U.S. The authors used an empirical approach to examine the audit committee practices of the Nasdaq 100 companies as of...

  • AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS AND AUDITOR CHANGES. Robinson, Diana R.; Owens-Jackson, Lisa // Academy of Accounting & Financial Studies Journal;Jun2009 Supplement, Vol. 13, p117 

    This study investigates whether audit committee characteristics (independence, financial expertise, diligence, governance expertise, and firm-specific knowledge) recommended by the Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) and widely supported by regulators are related to external auditor changes. Using a...

  • Audit Committees Oversight Responsibilities Post Sarbanes-Oxley Act. HassabElnaby, Hassan R.; Said, Amal; Wolfe, Glenn // American Journal of Business (American Journal of Business);Sep2007, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p19 

    In this study we examine the oversight responsibilities of audit committees in the post Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) era. The results show that audit committee oversight responsibilities assigned and disclosed in proxy statements expanded post-SOX compared to pre-SOX. We design a survey...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics