TITLE

Meaningless Mantra: Substantive Equality after Withler

AUTHOR(S)
Koshan, Jennifer; Hamilton, Jonnette Watson
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Review of Constitutional Studies;2011, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p31
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article examines the contribution made by the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Withler v Canada (Attorney General) to equality rights jurisprudence under section 150) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court's approach to issues concerning substantive equality, the use of comparative analysis and comparator groups, and the role and application of the contextual factors from Law v Canada are addressed. The authors raise concerns about the Court's narrow definition of discrimination, its return to the language of "relevance", the ways in which the Court imports section 1 justification considerations into the section 15(1) analysis, and the Court's lack of attention to the broader context beyond the benefits scheme at issue, including its lack of attention to the gender and class dimensions of the case. Overall, the authors conclude that although the Court has repeatedly stated a commitment to the principle of substantive equality in its section 15(1) Charter decisions, Withler is another example in a long line of cases that fails to give effect to that principle.
ACCESSION #
70145906

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics