[Commentary on] Conducting Research with Tribal Communities: Sovereignty, Ethics, and Data-Sharing Issues

Harding, Anna; Harper, Barbara; Stone, Dave; ONeill, Catherine; Berger, Patricia; Harris, Stuart; Donatuto, Jamie
January 2012
Environmental Health Perspectives;Jan2012, Vol. 120 Issue 1, p6
Academic Journal
Background: When conducting research with American Indian tribes, informed consent beyond conventional institutional review board (IRB) review is needed because of the potential for adverse consequences at a community or governmental level that are unrecognized by academic researchers. Objectives: In this article, we review sovereignty, research ethics, and data-sharing considerations when doing community-based participatory health-related or natural-resource-related research with American Indian nations and present a model material and data-sharing agreement that meets tribal and university requirements. Discussion: Only tribal nations themselves can identify potential adverse outcomes, and they can do this only if they understand the assumptions and methods of the proposed research. Tribes must be truly equal partners in study design, data collection, interpretation, and publication. Advances in protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are also applicable to IRB reviews, as are principles of sovereignty and indigenous rights, all of which affect data ownership and control. Conclusions: Academic researchers engaged in tribal projects should become familiar with all three areas: sovereignty, ethics and informed consent, and IPR. We recommend developing an agreement with tribal partners that reflects both health-related IRB and natural-resource-related IPR considerations.


Related Articles

  • Cultural issues should be addressed in IC process.  // IRB Advisor;8/1/2012, p87 

    The article discusses the need for cultural issues to be addressed in the case of informed consent (IC). Cynthia Woodsong, director of social and behavioral sciences at the International Partnership for Microbicides in Silver Spring, Maryland says that HIV research participants who were women,...

  • Texas A&M IC information sheet template.  // IRB Advisor;Aug2013, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p91 

    The article presents the Texas A&M University's informed consent (IC) information sheet template. Questions included in the information sheet include why the study is being done, what the alternatives are to being in this study and whether the information from the study will be kept private. It...

  • Nanomedicine First-in-Human Research: Challenges for Informed Consent. King, Nancy M. P. // Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics;Winter2012, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p823 

    Risks of harm, translational uncertainty, ambiguities in potential direct benefit, and long-term follow-up merit consideration in first-in-human research. Some nanomedical technologies have additional characteristics that should be addressed, including: defining and describing nanomedical...

  • Challenges of community engaged MH research.  // IRB Advisor;Aug2011, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p90 

    The article discusses the concept of community engagement in mental health research while suggesting that institutional review boards (IRBs) should avoid overreaching on protecting vulnerable community participants, which include participants and evaluators. Comments pertaining to the same are...

  • Moving Forward: Breaking the Cycle of Mistrust Between American Indians and Researchers. Pacheco, Christina M.; Daley, Sean M.; Brown, Travis; Filippi, Melissa; Greiner, Allen; Daley, Christine M. // American Journal of Public Health;Dec2013, Vol. 103 Issue 12, p2152 

    American Indians (AIs) have some of the poorest documented health outcomes of any racial/ethnic group. Research plays a vital role in addressing these health disparities. Historical and recent instances of unethical research, specifically the Havasupai diabetes project, have generated mistrust...

  • Outsourcing Ethical Obligations: Should the Revised Common Rule Address the Responsibilities of Investigators and Sponsors? Shah, Seema K. // Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics;Summer2013, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p397 

    The Common Rule creates a division of moral labor in research. It implies that investigators and sponsors can outsource their ethical obligations to IRBs and participants, thereby fostering a culture of compliance, rather than one of responsibility. The proposed revisions to the Common Rule are...

  • A Model for Strengthening Collaborative Research Capacity: Illustrations From the Atlanta Clinical Translational Science Institute. Rodgers, Kirsten C.; Akintobi, Tabia; Thompson, Winifred Wilkins; Evans, Donoria; Escoffery, Cam; Kegler, Michelle C. // Health Education & Behavior;Jun2014, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p267 

    Introduction. Community-engaged research is effective in addressing health disparities but may present challenges for both academic institutions and community partners. Therefore, the need to build capacity for conducting collaborative research exists. The purpose of this study is to present a...

  • Audit toolbag puts focus on improvement.  // IRB Advisor;Mar2012, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p34 

    The article discusses an audit program used by Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC) to find areas in human subject's protection that need improvement. It mentions that the quality assurance (QA) auditing team has added two new review types in the program namely, targeted audits and risk...

  • New Rules for Research with Human Participants? Berg, Jessica; Deming, Nicole // Hastings Center Report;Nov2011, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p10 

    The article discusses the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) pertaining to the rules governing oversight of research on human subjects published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Science and Technology. Among the rules covered are permission of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics