TITLE

Big Surprise: New York Times wallows in muddled reasoning on campaign finance restrictions

AUTHOR(S)
VON SPAKOVSKY, HANS A.
PUB. DATE
January 2012
SOURCE
Human Events;1/23/2012, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article explores the controversies surrounding a "New York Times" editorial which allegedly showed a complete misunderstanding of the campaign finance law, its history and the 1st amendment. The newspaper was reported to be apoplectic over an amicus brief filed by the Republican National Committee in the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals that argues that the federal ban on corporate contributions to candidates is unconstitutional.
ACCESSION #
70591416

 

Related Articles

  • The Clarence Thomas Court? GANDELMAN, JOE // Moderate Voice;4/4/2014, p10 

    The article reflects on the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's landmark decision calling for the total elimination of individual contribution caps in financing political campaigns. Thomas says that campaign finance laws are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution First Amendment....

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune International (Europe);3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p50 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune;3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p72 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • 50 years after New York Times v. Sullivan, do courts still value journalists' watchdog role? Persky, Anna Stolley // ABA Journal;Mar2014, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses the courts ruling in the U.S Supreme Court case New York Times v. Sullivan that established the actual malice standard and invigorated the watchdog role of the journalists. Topics discussed include defamation or libel case in which public officials pursuing libel or slander...

  • The Selective Conscientious Objectors Decision.  // America;3/20/1971, Vol. 124 Issue 11, p278 

    The article looks at the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on the difference in the draft treatment for total and selective conscientious objectors to particular wars. It says that the court upheld the notion that religious neutrality is the mandate of the First Amendment. The author explains the...

  • Amending the Amendment.  // America;5/25/1963, Vol. 108 Issue 21, p736 

    The author reflects on the issue of revising the religion clause in the First Amendment in the U.S. The author argues that it is worth it to think about the issue surrounding the likely revision of the First Amendment after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the New York school-prayer case....

  • "Clear and present danger.".  // America;8/19/1950, Vol. 83 Issue 20, p505 

    The article focuses on the conviction of 11 top U.S. Communist party leaders on October 14, 1949 for violating section 3 of the Smith Act of 1940 by conspiring to teach and advocate the forcible overthrow of the government. It considers some of the highlights of the opinion written by Justice...

  • Five Reasons Conservatives Should Oppose Lobbying 'Reform' Bill. Mitchell, Cleta // Human Events;7/30/2007, Vol. 63 Issue 26, p7 

    The author presents the five reasons U.S. conservatives should oppose the lobbying reform bill. He said that the bill intrudes upon the 1st Amendment-protected rights of citizens to petition their government. He advised that Congress should first determine how best to enforce the existing law...

  • THE CONSTITUTION AND INFORMATION POLITICS. McGinnis, John O. // Drake Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1055 

    This symposium Article argues that an important objective of a constitution should be to generate a sound information politics where citizens and leaders alike update on information about past policy to create better future policy. The U.S. Constitution contains many features friendly to a sound...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics