TITLE

The Impact Of Corporate Governance And The Sarbanes-Oxley Act On CEO Compensation

AUTHOR(S)
Nourayi, Mahmoud M.; Kalbers, Lawrence; Daroca, Frank P.
PUB. DATE
May 2012
SOURCE
Journal of Applied Business Research;May/Jun2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p463
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the effects of corporate governance on CEO compensation in light of regulatory controls introduced by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). The influence of economic and corporate governance variables on incentive-based CEO compensation are considered, using cross-section time-series panel data that includes multiple observations for the years 1999 to 2005. As expected, sales, firm performance (returns), and CEO age were found to positively affect the incentive components of CEO compensation. CEO duality, board size, and the percentage of outside directors had a significant influence on CEO compensation in the pre- SOX, but not post-SOX, period. The influences of these three variables in the pre-SOX period were not in the expected directions. Stratification of our sample into two groups by size reveals similarities and differences between smaller and larger firms. For both groups, economic determinants are more dominant than corporate governance variables as determinants of incentive-based CEO compensation. We find differences in the pattern and significance of variables between the smaller and larger firms, particularly for corporate governance variables, pre- and post-SOX These results suggest that the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms may vary by size of company.
ACCESSION #
75497031

 

Related Articles

  • Dynamics of CEO compensation: Old is gold. Adhikari, Hari P.; Bulmash, Samuel B.; Krolikowski, Marcin W.; Sah, Nilesh B. // Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance;Aug2015, Vol. 57, p191 

    There is an ongoing debate regarding the hiring and compensation of younger versus older employees. In this paper, we examine this question for Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) in the context of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002. We argue that the increased complexities in the post-SOX...

  • The Case for Independent Counsel. Rugen, Michael // NACD Directorship;Feb/Mar2008, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p52 

    The article discusses the case for independent counsel. Among the trends noted as a result of the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) are the recognition of most directors and chief executive officers (CEO) of the value of an independent board, and the need for directors to seek more...

  • Where China Lags Behind.  // NACD Directorship;Apr/May2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p5 

    The article focuses on the results of a study on Chinese corporate governance conducted by Heidric & Struggles in cooperation with the School of Management at Fudan University in Shanghai. It shows that few Chinese boards have control over the choice of a chief executive officer (CEO) because...

  • New Challenges For Corporate Governance. Beatty, David // Rotman Management;Fall2009, p58 

    The article reports on the new challenges faced by the board directors of corporations during the economic recession in the U.S. It notes that the recovered Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) reforms will enable chief executive officers (CEOs) of corporations to adapt a new governance reform that...

  • Power to Investors. Field, Anne // Treasury & Risk;Nov2007, p19 

    The article focuses on the shareholder activities and expectations for 2008. With the focus of the Sarbanes-Oxley on the empowerment of the board, governance experts believe that shareholders will be at an advantage in 2008. Companies have employed the majority rule in relation to election of a...

  • The Board's Annual Corporate Governance Review. Katz, David A.; McIntosh, Laura A. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses corporate matters that directors must identify to focus on during the board's annual corporate governance review. One important issue is director independence, where the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that a majority of directors on a board be independent. The...

  • Key Issues for Directors. Lipton, Martin // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q4, p1 

    The article offers information on key issues that directors of corporations should be aware of. Directors should be able to develop executive compensation programs to avoid public criticisms. They should understand the reforms after the Enron case and the Sarbanes-Oxley act. Directors need to be...

  • The use of restricted stock in CEO compensation and its impact in the pre- and post-SOX era. Weishen Wang; Minhua Yang // Journal of Finance & Accountancy;2013, Vol. 13, p1 

    The use of restricted stocks as a part of CEO compensation has increased. The value of the accumulated restricted stocks that a CEO holds is about three or four times larger than his/her base salary. We study the impact of these accumulated restricted stocks on firms before and after the...

  • A Tale of Two Clawbacks: The Compensation Consequences of Misstated Financials.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2010 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article discusses what public companies need to know about how section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002 and Dodd-Frank 954 clawback provisions operate, both individually and together. It highlights the use of SOX 304 clawback against uncharged chief executive officers and chief...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics