Neurology research network starts IRB review

June 2012
IRB Advisor;Jun2012, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p66
The article discusses NeuroNEXT, a network developed by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes (NINDS). The network coordinates institutional review board (IRB) reviews for institutions across the country in order to conduct trails of neurological therapies. It explains how sites can decide to participate in a particular study by looking at the central IRB's (CIRB's) review. Included are the comments by Pearl O'Rourke, director of human research affairs for Partners.


Related Articles

  • LAWS RELATING TO INFORMED CONSENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS. Craig, Kathrine J. // Nursing Standard;8/21/2013, Vol. 27 Issue 51, p33 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article by Andrew Pick et al. in the August 7, 2013 issue which was concerned with laws relating to informed consent in clinical research trials.

  • Research sites should update their disaster preparedness.  // Clinical Trials Administrator;Nov2011, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p121 

    The article discusses the need for disaster planning in research sites to avert unpredictable tornadoes, flooding and other natural disasters. It illustrates the example of the losses in the flood ridden institutional review board (IRB) office at the University of Texas Health Science Center...

  • Exempting All Minimal-Risk Research from IRB Review: Pruning or Poisoning the Regulatory Tree? ANANTH, MAHESH; SCHEESSELE, MICHAEL R. // IRB: Ethics & Human Research;Mar/Apr2012, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p9 

    No abstract available.

  • IRBs, others comment on possible change to centralized IRB reviews.  // IRB Advisor;Oct2011, Vol. 11 Issue 10, p97 

    The article discusses the proposed Common Rule changes that allow a central institutional review board (IRB), to review multiple site studies. It states that although multiple IRB reviews lessen individual responsibility, they initiate delays and use up unnecessary administrative task time....

  • A Federated Model of IRB Review for Multisite Studies: A Report on the National Children's Study Federated IRB Initiative. SLUTSMAN, JULIA; HIRSCHFELD, STEVEN // IRB: Ethics & Human Research;Nov/Dec2014, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p1 

    The article described a federated model of institutional review board (IRB) review for multisite studies being implemented by the National Children's Study in the U.S. It presents some preliminary data about its implementation and three options for IRB review incorporated in the federated model....

  • Research governance and bureaucracy for multisite studies: implications for occupational therapy research. Whitehead, Phillip; Drummond, Avril; Fellows, Karen // British Journal of Occupational Therapy;Jul2011, Vol. 74 Issue 7, p355 

    Obtaining research governance approvals for research involving the National Health Service (NHS) has become increasingly complex. In order to obtain the necessary approvals to interview 20 occupational therapists from a range of locations across the United Kingdom, the authors had to submit...

  • Are you more than just your cells? Henrietta inspires an artist. Bradley, Peter // British Journal of Healthcare Assistants;Jan2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p40 

    The article features healthcare assistant (HCA) Helen Wilson-Roe, who confessed that being an HCA drives her creative force as an artist. Wilson-Roe's art projects includes her Rwanda work and her second great project that pays tribute to Henrietta Lacks. The personal background of Wilson-Roe...

  • Researchers ignore past studies when conducting new ones.  // IRB Advisor;Apr2011, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p44 

    The article highlights that researchers routinely ignore past relevant clinical trials when conducting new studies, leading to unnecessary risks for participants. It includes comments from Karen Robinson, assistant professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in...

  • Assess your QI program and adjust according.  // Clinical Trials Administrator;Jul2011, Vol. 9 Issue 7, p81 

    The article discusses that research organizations assess and adjust their quality improvement (QI) and auditing programs to ensure compliance in human subjects research. An example of Winthrop University Hospital in Mineola, New York, is cited where evaluation of the QI program led to an...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics