Relationship Between Treatment Preference and Weight Loss in the Context of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Borradaile, Kelley E.; Halpern, Scott D.; Wyatt, Holly R.; Klein, Samuel; Hill, James O.; Bailer, Brooke; Brill, Carrie; Stein, Richard I.; Miller III, Bernard V.; Foster, Gary D.
June 2012
Obesity (19307381);Jun2012, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p1218
Academic Journal
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard used to assess the efficacy of treatment. While a well implemented RCT can produce an unbiased estimate of the relative difference between treatment groups, the generalizability of these findings may be limited. Specific threats to the external validity include treatment preference. The purposes of this study were to: (i) assess whether receiving one's treatment preference was associated with weight loss and retention and (ii) whether receiving one's treatment preference modified the relationship between the treatments and weight loss. Treatment preference was assessed in 250 subjects prior to but independent of randomization into either low-carbohydrate or low-fat diets. Treatment preference was a predictor of weight loss (P = 0.002) but not retention (P = 0.90). Participants who received their preference lost less weight (−7.7 kg, 95% confidence interval (CI): −9.3 to −6.1) than participants who did not receive their preference (−9.7 kg, 95% CI: −11.4 to −8.1) and participants who did not report a strong preference at baseline (−11.2 kg, 95% CI: −12.6 to −9.7) (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0004, respectively). Treatment preference did not modify the effect of the treatment on weight loss. Contrary to conceptual predictions, this study failed to identify an interaction between treatment preference and weight loss in the setting of a randomized trial. Until treatment preference effects are definitively ruled out in this domain, future studies might consider stratifying their randomization procedure by treatment preference rather than excluding participants with strong treatment preferences.


Related Articles

  • Low-Carbohydrate Diet Better Than Low-Fat Diet to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Cause Weight Loss. SHAUGHNESSY, ALLEN F. // American Family Physician;2/15/2015, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p262 

    The article discusses the results of a randomized controlled trial which compared the effectiveness of low-carbohydrate diet and low-fat diet in reducing cardiovascular events and in causing weight loss. Topics discussed include higher gains in lean mass and higher fat mass reduction in...

  • Low-Fat Versus Low-Carbohydrate Weight Reduction Diets. Bradley, Una; Spence, Michelle; Courtney, C. Hamish; McKinley, Michelle C.; Ennis, Cieran N.; McCance, David R.; McEneny, Jane; Bell, Patrick M.; Young, Ian S.; Hunter, Steven J. // Diabetes;Dec2009, Vol. 58 Issue 12, p2741 

    OBJECTIVE--Low-fat hypocaloric diets reduce insulin resistance and prevent type 2 diabetes in those at risk. Low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets are advocated as an alternative, but reciprocal increases in dietary fat may have detrimental effects on insulin resistance and offset the benefits of...

  • Effects of Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets. Bazzano, Lydia A.; Tian Hu; Reynolds, Kristi; Lu Yao; Bunol, Calynn; Yanxi Liu; Chung-Shiuan Chen; Klag, Michael J.; Whelton, Paul K.; Jiang He // Annals of Internal Medicine;9/2/2014, Vol. 161 Issue 5, p309 

    Background: Low-carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss, but their cardiovascular effects have not been well-studied, particularly in diverse populations. Objective: To examine the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet compared with a low-fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk...

  • HELP US REACH OUR FEEL GREAT WEIGHT! Ratledge, Ingela // Health (Time Inc.);Oct2009, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p110 

    The article offers tips and guidance on how to lose weight and live a healthy lifestyle. It explains the importance of flexible and frequent meals built around slow-digesting resistant starches and monounsaturated fats that fight body fat. It also presents various guides in taking and choosing a...

  • Cholesterol: What Camp Are You In? Allen, Seth // Nutritional Perspectives: Journal of the Council on Nutrition;Jan2006, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p23 

    THE CHOLESTEROL CONTROVERSY CONTINUES. Every day we're barraged with news about this enigmatic and potentially frightening topic. Whether it's in the newspaper with an article about a new fad diet, or on television with a commercial touting the newest statin drug. It seems we're drawn into three...

  • Simple Swaps.  // Working Mother;May2010, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p20 

    The article presents a reprint of the article "Simple Swaps" which appeared in the book "The Biggest Loser Simple Swaps: 100 Easy Changes to Start Living a Healthier Lifestyle," by Cheryl Forberg. It offers several nutritional and dietary tips including simple preparations using avocado and...

  • Cutting Fat or Carbs for Weight Loss?  // Joe Weider's Muscle & Fitness;Jul2001, Vol. 62 Issue 7, p205 

    Focuses on a research which determined the effects of low carbohydrate and fat intake on weight loss, featured in the 2001 issue of the `American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.' Details on the study; Benefits of reducing carbohydrate intake.

  • EAT RIGHT, GET RIPPED. Haycock, Bryan // Men's Fitness;Oct2010, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p92 

    The article presents weight-loss programs. The low-fat option will boost daily vitamin, mineral, and fiber intake due to its emphasis on carbohydrates. The Isocaloric option will make insulin levels relatively low and result in fewer food cravings and less hunger. The Low-carb option does not...

  • The meatless meal. Sandroff, Ronni // Consumer Reports on Health;Feb2001, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p2 

    Comments on growing trend towards lowered intake of high-fat meat amidst concerns over the dangers of high levels of fat and cholesterol in the diet.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics