TITLE

Senate Energy Legislation Receives Lukewarm Reception

PUB. DATE
June 2002
SOURCE
Energy User News;Jun2002, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the criticisms against the energy bill drafted by the U.S. Senate. Absence of provision for the drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; Rejection of measures to curb the use of gasoline in several vehicles; Comparison with the legislative bill passed in the U.S. House of Representatives.
ACCESSION #
7694062

 

Related Articles

  • United Seniors Praises House Vote on Energy.  // Human Events;8/13/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 30, p20 

    Reports that the United Seniors Association has praised the United States (U.S.) House for its vote on energy legislation that would allow oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Significance of the energy legislation to the people of the U.S. according to the association.

  • House and Senate process rival Energy bills.  // Power Economics;May2003, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p4 

    Reports on the processing of rival energy legislative bills by the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Aim of reducing the energy dependence of the country; Promotion of energy resources; Controversy over the proposed drilling of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

  • End-Game Near for Senate Energy Bill; Cogeneration Vote Possible. Franz, Neil // Chemical Week;4/24/2002, Vol. 164 Issue 17, p12 

    Focuses on several proposals to the energy legislation of the U.S. Senate. Stance of chemical companies on the cogeneration proposal; Decision of Senators on the amendment to allow oil and natural gas exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska.

  • Too wild to lose. Waterman, J.; Brower, D. // Backpacker;Mar1988, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p40 

    Three articles explore the controversy surrounding the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. North Slope oil reserves; Policy of the Reagan Administration; Differing views of Alaskans in the village of Kaktoville; Oil and jobs versus preservation of nature.

  • Polar opposites. Udall, J.R. // Sierra;Sep/Oct87, Vol. 72 Issue 5, p40 

    The so-called 1002 area of the Hulahula River in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a coastal plain that biologists consider important because it is a breeding ground for many birds and mammals. Secretary of the Interior Donald Hodel is urging Congress to lease the area for oil exploration....

  • Energy security requires development of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.  // Nation's Business;May91, Vol. 79 Issue 5, p75 

    Editorial. Calls for the development of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. Dangers of growing U.S. dependence on foreign oil production; Response to environmental opposition to the development of the ANWR.

  • Our energy security answer: ANWR! Keating-Edh, B. // Consumer Comments;Jul/Aug91, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p6 

    Calls opening Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) coastal plain for oil exploration an important solution to meeting the energy goals of American consumers. Only small area to be explored; Safety record of Prudhoe Bay excellent; Consumer alert Washington Director Scott Pattison...

  • Drilling blocked in Arctic Refuge. Byrnes, P. // Wilderness (07366477);Winter91, Vol. 55 Issue 195, p4 

    Reports that the efforts of the Wilderness Society and other groups helped turn back a congressional effort to allow development and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The defeated legislation contained several controversial provisions.

  • Long wait. Miller, William H. // Industry Week/IW;7/17/95, Vol. 244 Issue 14, p62 

    Reports on the victory of oil industries against environmentalists on the drilling access to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Inclusion of provision in the US Congress' budget resolution; Support from chairman committees.

Share

Other Topics