TITLE

Intelligent Design Creationism and the Mechanisms of Postmodernity

AUTHOR(S)
Carbonell, Curtis D.
PUB. DATE
November 2011
SOURCE
Journal of Religion & Popular Culture;Nov2011, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p276
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article provides a critical reading of Intelligent Design proponents' attempt to create a wedge in secular society to reinsert a theistic worldview. It argues they assert their wedge via the mechanisms of postmodernity: following Frederic Jameson, those informational elements of mass culture that allow them to present their ideas as an alternate to that posed by evolutionary biology. It centres on a representation (by the philosopher of science Robert Pennock) of Intelligent Design advocate, Philip E. Johnson as a postmodern thinker. This article revises Pennock, claiming that while Johnson does attack modern science in his project to champion Intelligent Design, Johnson is not a representative of many precepts of postmodernity. In particular, this chapter reads Johnson as clearly supporting a Christian metanarrative. Moreover, Johnson is a representative of a strategy formulated by the conservative organization, The Discovery Institute, and their campaign called the Wedge Strategy. Exemplified by an internal document leaked to the internet, 'The Wedge' is a clearly explicated strategy to combat secular society.
ACCESSION #
78164516

 

Related Articles

  • Whither "Intelligent Design" Creationism? Lerner, Lawrence S. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p18 

    The article discusses the historical and philosophical evolution of "intelligent design" creationism. It explores on various related concepts of creationism which have helped creationists to introduce the supernatural works into observable nature. It also talks about the biological concepts...

  • The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism. Pennock, Robert T. // Science & Education;Jun2010, Vol. 19 Issue 6-8, p757 

    That Intelligent Design Creationism rejects the methodological naturalism of modern science in favor of a premodern supernaturalist worldview is well documented and by now well known. An irony that has not been sufficiently appreciated, however, is the way that ID Creationists try to advance...

  • Evolution and Creationism in Science: 1880-2000. Bleckmann, Charles A. // BioScience;Feb2006, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p151 

    The journal Science has documented the evolutionist-creationist controversy since it began publication in 1880. The annual number of references suggests the intensity of the public debate. Peaks occurred in response to the Scopes trial (1925) and trials in California (1979-1981), Arkansas...

  • Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Mar/Apr2008, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p21 

    The article reviews the book "Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics," edited by Robert T. Pennock.

  • How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

  • EVOLUCIÓN: ¿UNA TEORÍA? AZNAVURIAN, AVEDIS // Ludus Vitalis;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 32, p221 

    This paper reviews the status of evolutionary and natural selection theories, based on their solidity as scientific stances. Recent analysis that confirm and discuss some of its fundaments are considered, specially those given by researchers in the biological sciences, as well as the diverse...

  • The Evolutionary Origins of Genetic Information. Freeland, Stephen // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Dec2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p240 

    Any living branch of science achieves progress by testing new ideas. The results of these tests determine whether each new idea is accepted as a change to what we thought we knew, is dismissed as incorrect, or simply stagnates, owing to a lack of clear evidence. For evolutionary theory, one such...

  • Intelligent Design: A Response. Hadley, Martin // Australasian Science;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p46 

    Comments on a Christian lobby group's arguments for the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to the teaching of evolution. Belief of the group regarding creation and the Book of Genesis; Criticisms against taking the text of Genesis literally; Advice on debating with a scientist...

  • EDITORIAL.  // Australasian Science;Jul2007, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1 

    The author comments on the advocacy of Doctor John Ashton of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (RACI) of intelligent design (ID). Ashton received harsh criticism from the scientific community due to his support of ID. Tas Wager of the of Creation of Ministries International accuses...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics