TITLE

Protecting Endangered Species: Do the Main Legislative Tools Work?

AUTHOR(S)
Gibbs, Katherine E.; Currie, David J.
PUB. DATE
May 2012
SOURCE
PLoS ONE;May2012, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
It is critical to assess the effectiveness of the tools used to protect endangered species. The main tools enabled under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) to promote species recovery are funding, recovery plan development and critical habitat designation. Earlier studies sometimes found that statistically significant effects of these tools could be detected, but they have not answered the question of whether the effects were large enough to be biologically meaningful. Here, we ask: how much does the recovery status of ESA-listed species improve with the application of these tools? We used species' staus reports to Congress from 1988 to 2006 to quantify two measures of recovery for 1179 species. We related these to the amount of federal funding, years with a recovery plan, years with critical habitat designation, the amount of peer-reviewed scientific information, and time listed. We found that change in recovery status of listed species was, at best, only very weakly related to any of these tools. Recovery was positively related to the number of years listed, years with a recovery plan, and funding, however, these tools combined explain ,13% of the variation in recovery status among species. Earlier studies that reported significant effects of these tools did not focus on effect sizes; however, they are in fact similarly small. One must conclude either that these tools are not very effective in promoting species' recovery, or (as we suspect) that species recovery data are so poor that it is impossible to tell whether the tools are effective or not. It is critically important to assess the effectiveness of tools used to promote species recovery; it is therefore also critically important to obtain population status data that are adequate to that task.
ACCESSION #
79459715

 

Related Articles

  • ENDANGERED SPECIES.  // World Almanac for Kids;2003, p29 

    When an animal species begins to die out, the animal is said to be endangered or threatened. As of 2003, 1,070 species of animals were endangered or threatened, according to the National Wildlife Federation. Some endangered species are the Giant panda, the blue whale, the California condor,...

  • Reintroduction of Captive Mammals for Conservation. Kleiman, Devra G. // BioScience;Mar1989, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p152 

    Offers detailed guidelines for reintroducing endangered species into the wild. Conditions which will lead to successful reintroduction; Examples from recent reintroduction efforts; Habitat protection and restoration; Education and public relations.

  • Balancing Army and Endangered Species Concerns: Green vs. Green. McKee, Michael; Berrens, Robert P. // Environmental Management;Jan2001, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p123 

    A number of endangered, threatened, or at-risk species have been identified on US Army training bases. Before further training is restricted or curtailed under provisions of the US Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Army can explore available proactive options for providing habitat protection and...

  • Rethinking Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Monitoring Programs: An Innovative Approach in San Diego, California. Greer, Keith A.; Rocks, Melanie Johnson // Endangered Species Update;Jul-Sep2007, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p91 

    Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) have become a common, albeit still controversial, method for conserving endangered species at the regional level while balancing the social and economic needs of a region. Since 1982 when Congress first amended the Endangered Species Act to allow for HCPs, more...

  • Ecologists attack plans for rare-species act. Marris, Emma // Nature;12/9/2004, Vol. 432 Issue 7018, p661 

    The article focuses on the fears of environment groups in the U.S. that the changes to the Endangered Species Act, which protects species' habitats throughout the U.S. will weaken it. The Endangered Species Act is administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. It maintains a list of more...

  • Model of the assessment of the critical risk of extinction and the priorities of protection of endangered aquatic species at the national level. Simić, V.; Simić, Snežana; Paunović, M.; Cakić, P. // Biodiversity & Conservation;Aug2007, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p2471 

    In the period 1995-2006, the biodiversity of the aquatic habitats in the area of Serbia was explored, with the aim to identify the endangered species of macroalgae, macroinvertebratae and fishes. During the work a data base was formed (Aquatic Ecosystems Diversity in Serbia, AEDSer), containing...

  • The difficulties of cohabitation. Larmer, Paul // High Country News;2/20/2006, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p2 

    The article discusses the Endangered Species Act. The law was signed in 1973 by President Richard M. Nixon. It constitutes the most noble conservation intention for all the imperiled plants, fishes and wildlife species. The extinction of these species are brought about by economic growth and the...

  • What's UP?  // Ranger Rick;Aug2003, Vol. 37 Issue 8, p20 

    Presents information about endangered species. INSET: WILD WORD OF THE MONTH.

  • ENDANGERED SPECIES.  // World Almanac for Kids;2005, p71 

    The article looks at endangered species in the world as of January 2005. When a species becomes extinct, it reduces the variety of life on Earth. In the world today, 2,336 known species of animals (and even more plants) are endangered, according to the International Union for Conservation of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics