TITLE

CITIZENS UNITED IMPACT ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS

PUB. DATE
April 2012
SOURCE
Drake Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p685
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents a panel discussion on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on judicial elections. Topics include campaign finance restrictions, the First Amendment rights of corporations, and how corporate donors impact judicial elections in the U.S.
ACCESSION #
83413956

 

Related Articles

  • Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment. Mitchell, Cleta // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1755 

    An essay is presented on the legal aspects of American political campaign donations, including an analysis of the protections afforded to citizens under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election...

  • LET THE PEOPLE SPEAK: THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO REMOVE CORPORATE SPEECH FROM THE AMBIT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Weissman, Robert // Temple Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p979 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which dealt with campaign finance. Information is provided on how the decision gave corporations First Amendment protections and allowed corporations to make unlimited amounts of donations...

  • Politicians in black robes. Stanfel, Rebecca // High Country News;2/6/2012, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p7 

    The article discusses the controversy surrounding the elections of state judges in Montana. It refers to Montana's history of corruption during the era of the Copper Kings Mining Corp. that justifies the state exemption in campaign finance laws. It cites the Montana Supreme Court ruling in the...

  • Shareholder Rights: Citizens United and Delaware Corporate Governance Law. Miller, Paul S. // Journal of Law & Politics;Fall2012, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p51 

    The article discusses a court case of Citizens United v. FEC based on the First Amendment political speech doctrine of the U.S. Constitution. The issues related to campaign finance reform, its effects on the corporate law and the protection of property rights and political speech rights are...

  • DIVIDING CITIZENS UNITED: THE CASE V. THE CONTROVERSY. Tribe, Laurence H. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p463 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC related to the spending of money by corporations in the elections and use for the prevention of political corruption and its improper influence in the electoral process. It mentions that the decision is based on the First...

  • Six Myths About Campaign Money. Carney, Eliza Newlin // National Journal;8/7/2010, p2 

    The article discusses some beliefs on campaign funds in the U.S. The author explains the reason why no unions or corporations will provide resources into campaigns, as claimed by some political scientists. Some analysts claimed that the ruling in the case Citizens United versus Federal Election...

  • INTRODUCTION: A PANEL DISCUSSION ON CITIZENS UNITED IMPACT ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS.  // Drake Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p681 

    The article presents an introduction to a panel discussion on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on judicial elections. Topics include campaign finance restrictions, the First Amendment rights of corporations, and how...

  • A Triumph for Political Speech. Rubin, Jennifer // Commentary;May2010, Vol. 129 Issue 5, p16 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, in which the court struck down the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. It describes McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform and its goal to limit contributions from...

  • Citizens United v. FEC. Clift, Eleanor // NonProfit Times;4/1/2010, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p19 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on Citizens United v. FEC lifting the caps on the amount of money corporations and unions can spend to promote political candidates. It mentions supporters of the decision like Cleta Mitchell, a partner at the Foley & Lardner...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics