TITLE

To DEFER OR NOT TO DEFER? DEFERENCE AND ITS DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN THE ROBERTS COURT

AUTHOR(S)
Calvert, Clay; Hayes, Justin B.
PUB. DATE
October 2012
SOURCE
Case Western Reserve Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p13
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the concept of deference in context with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which protects the rights of individuals to freedom of speech under the Roberts Court which refers to the U.S. Supreme Court. It also mentions about disagreements among the Justices on the use of deference. It also mentions that deference is adopted based on Justice's personal sensibilities to strike balance between judicial abdication and judicial activism.
ACCESSION #
84021192

 

Related Articles

  • IMAGINARY THREATS TO GOVERNMENT'S EXPRESSIVE INTERESTS. Norton, Helen // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1265 

    The article discusses the exemption of the government's own speech from the free speech clause scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court. It highlights the importance of government expression which enables members of the public to identify the priorities of the government. It emphasizes the court case...

  • FREE SPEECH FOR YOU AND ME, BUT NOT FOR PROFESSIONALS. SANDEFUR, TIMOTHY // Regulation;Winter2015/2016, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p48 

    The article discusses the degree to which the U.S. Supreme Court has not addressed the Constitution over the rights of professionals, including doctors, lawyers, and stock brokers, to speak as part of their jobs, under the First Amendment. It notes the protections afforded by commercial speech...

  • The Free Speech Jurisprudence of the Rehnquist Court.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1991, Vol. 29, p83 

    An essay is presented on free speech jurisprudence under the leadership of U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist during his 1988-1989 and 1989-1990 U.S. Supreme Court terms. The author states that those observers who criticized Rehnquist Court's jurisprudence for cutting back on individual...

  • FROM ARMBANDS TO DOUCHEBAGS: How DONINGER V. NIEHOFF SHOWS THE SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO ADDRESS STUDENT SPEECH IN THE CYBER AGE. Hayes, Allison E. // Akron Law Review;2010, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p247 

    The article discusses several First Amendment student speech cases including the Doninger v. Niehoff decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The author explains that the First Amendment of the Constitution stipulates that the Congress shall make no law that abridged the freedom of speech. She reveals...

  • The "Bong Hits" Case and Viewpoint Discrimination: A State Law Answer to Protecting Unpopular Student Viewpoints. Mayor, Evan // George Washington Law Review;Apr2009, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p799 

    This article aims to determine the level of protection provided by the First Amendment to student speech in the U.S. It explores the struggle by giving a brief history of student speech law, including relevant decisions by the Supreme Court. It also assesses the state of the law regarding the...

  • ANTAGONISM AND A FREE SOCIETY.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1973, Vol. 12, p13 

    The article focuses on antagonism and its relation to the free speech. It mentions that research studies regarding dogmatism and rigidity shows that antagonism is far the idea of private property. It mentions that free speech was conceptualized in consideration to the decision of the U.S....

  • Minority Opinion.  // Time; 

    The article focuses on the controversial views of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo L. Black on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1962. The First Amendment guarantees absolute freedom of speech and the press. Black says that the First Amendment leaves the offenders like...

  • GOOD ENOUGH FOR GOVERNMENT WORK: TWO CHEERS FOR CONTENT NEUTRALITY. Kreimer, Seth F. // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;May2014, Vol. 16 Issue 5, p1261 

    When then-Professor Elena Kagan emerged on the public stage in the mid-1990s, she declared "the distinction between content-based and content-neutral regulations of speech serves as the keystone of First Amendment law." In the last decade and a half, commentators and Supreme Court opinions...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Brief Filed Against Funeral Protesting.  // American Funeral Director;Jul2010, Vol. 133 Issue 7, p10 

    The article reports on a brief filed by the family of U.S. Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder with the U.S. Supreme Court to determine coverage of First Amendment limits and whether freedom of speech takes precedence over families' rights to mourn at military funerals. The case stems from...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics