TITLE

Clifford Chance's fight for Chagos Islanders fails in ECHR

AUTHOR(S)
Harris, Joanne
PUB. DATE
January 2013
SOURCE
Lawyer (Online Edition);1/3/2013, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the ruling passed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the government of Great Britain by the Chagos Islanders are refused in Great Britain. It mentions that in 2002, islanders launched the litigation against Attorney General, Justice Ouseley. It states that the islander lodged proceedings against the ECHR of the European Convention of Human Rights.
ACCESSION #
84739082

 

Related Articles

  • Case Commentaries. Pattenden, Rosemary // International Journal of Evidence & Proof;Mar2009, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p58 

    The article presents information on the case Gäfgen v Germany. It is stated that the decision made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in this case about the admissibility of evidence tainted by a violation of Article 3 is important. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human...

  • APPLICATION OF THE RESOLUTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE GENERAL JURISDICTION COURTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Hvichayevich, Ananiyev Akaky // Society: Politics, Economics, Law;2013, Issue 3, p1 

    This article reviews how the general jurisdiction courts apply the Resolutions of the European Court of Human Rights and European Convention on Human Rights when executing the criminal proceedings. The undertaken research shows the development level of the criminal procedure in Russia in the...

  • ‘Diagnostics’—a Judgment Applying the Convention of Human Rights to the Field of Competition. Oliver, Peter // Journal of European Competition Law & Practice;Apr2012, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p163 

    In this case, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) dismissed a claim that the system of judicial review of decisions of the Italian Competition Authority was incompatible with Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

  • FAMOUS CASES WHICH CONFIRMED THE RIGHT TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ON NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEVELS. COBZARU, ANGELICA // Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice;2013, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p400 

    Fundamental human right to a healthy environment is part of the latest human rights, also called generation "solidarity rights," which stated largely in the European Court of Human Rights. The starting point is the Article 8, paragraph 1, of the European Convention on privacy and family life, so...

  • Case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. The United KingdomEuropean Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section) Judgment. Early, Lawrence; Garlicki, Lech // International Journal of Refugee Law;May2012, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p294 

    The article focuses on the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom. It mentions that the court found violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which prohibits ill-treatment...

  • Anderson v United Kingdom.  // EG: Estates Gazette;2/20/2010, Issue 1007, p100 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the European Court of Human Rights had allowed the application for damages for breach of right to fair trial, pursuant to Article 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In Anderson v. United Kingdom, the applicant challenged the statutory...

  • RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. Volzhskaya, Mariya S. // Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law;4/1/2011, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p651 

    The article discusses the court case Vassiliy Kononov v. Latvia in which the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) takes a controversial position on war crimes. Kononov alleges that his actions were not war crimes in 1944. ECHR discovers European Convention on Human Rights does not restrict...

  • Taking A Neutral Stance on the Legal Protection of the Fetus. Katherine O'Donovan // Medical Law Review;Apr2006, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p115 

    The article discusses the court case Vo versus France, wherein the European Court of Human Rights took a neutral stance on the issue of providing legal protection to fetus. The applicant Thi-Nho Vo claimed that the French law failed to provide protection to her unborn child and that the failure...

  • The Exercise of Public Health Powers in Cases of Infectious Disease: Human Rights Implications. Robyn Martin // Medical Law Review;Apr2006, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p132 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) determined whether the exercise of public health powers to prevent the spread of an infectious disease complied with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In Enhorn...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics