Stuff versus individuals

Lewowicz, Lucía; Lombardi, Olimpia
April 2013
Foundations of Chemistry;Apr2013, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p65
Academic Journal
The general question to be considered in this paper points to the nature of the world described by chemistry: what is macro-chemical ontology like? In particular, we want to identify the ontological categories that underlie chemical discourse and chemical practice. This is not an easy task, because modern Western metaphysics was strongly modeled by theoretical physics. For this reason, we attempt to answer our question by contrasting macro-chemical ontology with the mainstream ontology of physics and of traditional metaphysics. In particular, we introduce the distinction between stuff-ontology, proper of chemistry, and individual-ontology, proper of physics. These two ontologies differ from each other in the basic categories of their own structures. On this basis, we characterize individual-ontology in such a way that the features of stuff-ontology will arise by contrast with it.


Related Articles

  • Married Causes. Engelhardt, Jeff // Acta Analytica;Jun2014, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p161 

    Many philosophers accept some version of a principle that says for all x, if x exists, then x plays a unique causal role. After briefly clarifying one version of the principle in Section 1, Section 2 gives reasons to doubt it by showing that there are non-identical 'causal indiscernibles'-I call...

  • NON-REDUCTIVE REALIZATION AND THE POWERS-BASED SUBSET STRATEGY. Wilson, Jessica // Monist;Jan2011, Vol. 94 Issue 1, p121 

    The article discusses the non-reductive realization and its relation to the lower level entities including non-reductive physicalism which is nothing over and above physical entities. It mentions that the non-reductive physicalists (NRPists) aim at showing how dependent higher-level entities...

  • Why is there anything except physics? Loewer, Barry // Synthese;Sep2009, Vol. 170 Issue 2, p217 

    In the course of defending his view of the relation between the special sciences and physics from Jaegwon Kim�s objections Jerry Fodor asks �So then, why is there anything except physics?� By which he seems to mean to ask if physics is fundamental and complete in its domain how...

  • A defence of the via negativa argument for physicalism. Montero, Barbara; Papineau, David // Analysis;Jul2005, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p233 

    The article presents information on the via negativa argument for physicalism. The key premiss in the familiar causal argument for physicalism is the Completeness of Physics (CP). Given this premiss and assuming the implausibility of systematic causal overdetermination, it follows that...

  • Logic and Metaphysics: Heinrich Scholz and the Scientific World View. PECKHAUS, VOLKER // Philosophia Mathematica;Feb2008, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p78 

    The anti-metaphysical attitude of the neo-positivist movement is notorious. It is an essential mark of what its members regarded as the scientific world view. The paper focuses on a metaphysical variation of the scientific world view as proposed by Heinrich Scholz and his Münster group, who...

  • Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the 'Physical': Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of.... Crook, Seth; Gillett, Carl // Canadian Journal of Philosophy;Sep2001, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p333 

    Examines the relationship among physics, materialism, metaphysics and the formulation of physicalism. Configuration of all philosophical issues and projects; Nature of physicalism attention; Metaphysical roots of physicalism.

  • IRREDUCIBLE HOLISM. Wiśniewski, Jakub Bożydar // Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy;Dec2011, Issue 30, p76 

    The article discusses the issues surrounding the philosophy of ontological reduction and its relation to physicalism and conceptual reduction where according to it, persons generally seem to eschew. It mentions the issues surrounding this philosophy including the irreducible holism,...

  • How superduper does a physicalist supervenience need to be? Wilson, Jessica // Philosophical Quarterly;Jan99, Vol. 49 Issue 194, p33 

    Focuses on the constraint suggested by Terence Hogan when any genuinely physicalist metaphysics should countenance ontological inter-level supervenience relations. Standard formulations of the supervenience relation; Robust explanation of the supervenience relation in a physically acceptable...

  • The four-category ontology: reply to Kistler. Lowe, E. J. // Analysis;Apr2004, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p152 

    Delves into the concept of four-category ontology. Overview of the concept; Characterization of universals and particulars; Attributes of each sub-category of characterizable particulars.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics