Upfront QUIZ 2

December 2002
New York Times Upfront (Teacher's Edition);12/13/2002, Vol. 135 Issue 6, pT5
Presents a quiz regarding the nuclear weapons of North Korea.


Related Articles

  • CARTERITIS: Rx. Lynch, Kevin // National Review;8/22/1980, Vol. 32 Issue 17, p1030 

    The article reviews the book "Tactical Nuclear Weapons: An Examination of the Issues," by William R. Van Cleave and S. T. Cohen.

  • Atomic crisis.  // America;10/8/1949, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p6 

    The author discusses the implications of the announcement by U.S. President Harry Truman that Russia had exploded the atom bomb. He explains that Russia's acquisition of the ultimate weapon has removed the sense of security of the people in the U.S. The end of the monopoly of the U.S. on the...

  • The Iranian Dilemma: Israel (Part 1). Kazerooni, Ibrahim; Prince, Rob // Foreign Policy in Focus;11/15/2011, p3 

    The author discusses issues pertaining to a potential attack against Iran by Israel. In the middle of the Arab Spring protest movements, the involvement of Israel in anti-Iranian campaigns has intensified. Israel continues to view Iran as its adversary particularly after news about the...

  • Laboratories begin research on common warhead.  // Aviation Week & Space Technology;9/18/1989, Vol. 131 Issue 12, p33 

    Reports the Los Alamos and Sandia national laboratories have begun design definition and detailed cost analyses for a new nuclear warhead that will be common to the Air Force's tactical Short Range Attack Missile (SRAM-T) and the Army's Follow-onto Lance (FOTL) system.

  • US nuclear weapons production: an overview. Cochran, T.B.; Arkin, W. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1988, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p12 

    Discusses the problem of aging warhead-producing facilities in the US. How these facilities, built in the 1940s and 1950s, are limiting production of warhead materials such as plutonium, tritium and weapon-grade uranium. INSET: Glossary.;A military fuel cycle primer..

  • A case against producing nuclear material. Albright, D.; Paine, C. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1988, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p46 

    The authors argue in favor of a cutoff agreement for production of nuclear materials. The decision to produce, or not produce, new materials depends on arms reductions, kinds of weapons, rates of deployment, and production efficiency.

  • The people vs. the complex. Charles, D. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1988, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p29 

    Looks at citizen groups who have held the US government accountable for problems at weapons facilities. Energy Research Foundation of S. Car.; Hanford Education Action League (HEAL) of Spokane, Wash.

  • The buildup that wasn't. Arkin, W. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1989, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p6 

    Report that when Ronald Reagan told voters in 1984 that the US had regained nuclear superiority, they believed him--and stopped supporting his expensive, troubled weapons programs. Antinuclear movement; New deployment; Restructured nuclear forces.

  • New players in the nuclear game. Spector, L.S. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1989, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p29 

    Discusses the spread of nuclear arms to regional powers in some of the world's most troubled areas. Reagan administration's overall record in dealing with specific emerging nuclear states; Nonproliferation not a high priority of Reagan administration; Civilian use of plutonium.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics