Video footage reveals N. Korea's elaborate nuclear site design; S. Korean commander raises 'pre-emptive strike'

February 2013
East-Asia-Intel Reports;2/6/2013, p11
The article reports on the discovery of North Korea's nuclear test site by Google Earth. It notes that North Korea is believed to have detonated a nuclear device in May 2009 inside a mountain tunnel with a camouflage net over the entrance. It adds that the site aims to foil U.S. intelligence efforts to determine whether a detonation there is imminent.


Related Articles

  • Should Development Of Nuclear Weapons Be Prohibited By International Agreement? CON. Teller, Edward // Congressional Digest;Oct58, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p243 

    For years there has been diligent and excellent work on the question how to detect tests. The U.S., is vitally interested in tests going on everywhere, and so the methods of detection have been developed. Testing small explosions, one is learning more and more about the way how bigger explosions...

  • Should Development Of Nuclear Weapons Be Prohibited By International Agreement? PRO.  // Congressional Digest;Oct58, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p248 

    The enhancement of the security of the United States and of the world is a fundamental purpose, and the nuclear test issue is to be judged primarily in this context. The current arms race, which is diminishing United States and world security, cannot be checked and reversed without effective...

  • We Have Continued Too Long the Ban on Nuclear Tests.  // Saturday Evening Post;7/8/1961, Vol. 234 Issue 27, p10 

    Comments on the continued efforts of the U.S. government to persuade Soviets to agree on nuclear tests. Doubts on the possibility of all reasonable opportunities to conclude an effective international agreement banning all tests; Affirmation of the responsibility the Atomic Energy Commission to...

  • Comments on Pugwash: From the West Perils from War vs. Those from Tests. Thirring, Hans // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar1958, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p121 

    The article compares the after-effects of an atomic bomb explosion with that of nuclear tests, based on facts and arguments posed at the 1957 international Pugwash conference in Canada. One of the most frequently discussed fact in the conference is that the main causes of radiological injuries...

  • CHINA'S BOMB: EXPLOITATION AND REACTIONS. Powell, Ralph L. // Foreign Affairs;Jul1965, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p616 

    This article discusses the implications of the atomic bomb testing in China. When the Chinese People's Republic exploded an atomic bomb in October 1964, it opened a new and dangerous phase in the atomic era. It is true that this original test had no immediate military significance, but it had...

  • DEEP BACKGROUND.  // American Conservative;4/23/2007, Vol. 6 Issue 8, p15 

    The article offers politics and war-related news briefs. The underground nuclear test, which was conducted in October 2006 in Pyongyang, North Korea, demonstrated that the country has not made a working nuclear bomb. California congressman Henry Waxman's Oversight and Government Reform and...

  • NONCOERCIVE INDUCEMENTS IN U.S.-SOVIET CONFLICTS: ENDING THE OCCUPATION OF AUSTRIA AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTS. Kriesberg, Louis // Journal of Political & Military Sociology;Spring81, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1 

    Three basic inducements in conflict are distinguished: coercion, persuasion and reward; then the variety of noncoercive inducements are described. The conditions affecting the likelihood of using different blends of inducements are examined. These ideas are applied to two specific conflicts...

  • …BUT NOT AT THE U.N. Krauthammer, Charles // Time International (South Pacific Edition);10/23/2006, Issue 42, p19 

    The author criticizes the United Nations (UN) Security Council in handling the North Korean nuclear bomb test issue. He claims that at Russian and Chinese insistence, the unanimously approved Security Council resolution imposes mere inconveniences that do nothing to threaten the regime's...

  • ABC v. the Reporters.  // Time;11/12/1951, Vol. 58 Issue 20, p44 

    The article reports on the scheduled testing of an atomic weapon by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) at the mountainside of the state of Nevada in early November 1951. Nearly 100 reporters were there to cover the blast, although they were not invited to attend the testing. According to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics