TITLE

R.E. v. New York City Dep't of Educ

AUTHOR(S)
Mathews, Lindsay
PUB. DATE
January 2013
SOURCE
Urban Lawyer;Winter2013, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p319
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the New York Court case R.E. v. New York City Dep't of Educ., which dealt with private school tuition reimbursement in cases where a child's proposed individual education program (IEP) fails to provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) under the Individuals with U.S. Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Topics include a child's qualifications for special education services and due process complaints.
ACCESSION #
88455751

 

Related Articles

  • SPECIAL EDUCATION CONFLICT: A Symptom of Poor Outcomes for Students. Gelser, Sara A. // GPSolo;Mar/Apr2014, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p38 

    The article discusses the special education law for disabled students in the U.S. and the need for its reform. PL 94-142, originally called the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, was passed in 1975 and was focused on basic procedural issues that reflected the primary goal of allowing...

  • High Court Case Could Rein In Private Placements Under IDEA. Walsh, Marl // Education Week;9/26/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p1 

    The article reports on a U.S. Supreme Court case, "Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York v. Tom F," in which the district and a parent disagree over attempts to provide an appropriate education plan for a student with a learning disability. The case is summarized...

  • "You Gotta Know the Rules If You're Gonna Play the Game". TiscareƱo-Sato, Graciela // Future Reflections;Sep2009, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p35 

    The article presents suggestions for parents of children with special needs to become empowered by learning U.S. state and federal special education laws to become advocates for their children. The author recommends the Wrightslaw Special Education Law Boot Camp for parents of children who are...

  • 10 Things Never to Say. Croyle, Kimberly // School Administrator;Oct2007, Vol. 64 Issue 9, p26 

    The author, a U.S. attorney, presents 10 statements that should never be spoken during an individual education plan meeting between school personnel and parents seeking special educational accommodations for their child. She warns that these statements can lead to complaints and possibly legal...

  • Californians Offer Five Big Ideas on IDEA.  // NEA Today;Mar2003, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p15 

    Presents ideas suggested by the California Teachers Association for the improvement of the U.S. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Importance of protecting students' rights; Function of Individual Education Plans; Amount paid by California districts to each student identified under...

  • Up Front with the President. Perry, Harold W. // Exceptional Children;Sep1977, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p5 

    The article comments on several issues concerning special education and exceptional children in the United States in 1977. Key issues discussed include the key stipulations of the Public Law 94-142 on individualized education programs, the complexities of assessing the educational requirements...

  • Evaluation of Written Individualized Education Programs. Andersen, Lee H.; Barner, Sandra L.; Larson, Harry J. // Exceptional Children;Nov1978, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p207 

    The article describes written programs that are very similar to those required by Public Law 94-142 that educational agencies serving handicapped pupils develop written individualized education programs for each pupil they serve. These programs, called individual education plans, were produced...

  • Bidding (Fair)well to Due Process: The Need for a Fairer Final Stage in Special Education Dispute Resolution. COPE-KASTEN, CALI // Journal of Law & Education;Summer2013, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p501 

    The article discusses due process of law in the U.S. and a call for a fairer final stage in special education dispute resolution matters in America as of July 2013. Legal rights for disabled students are addressed in relation to the U.S. Congress' passage of the Education for All Handicapped...

  • Participation in the Development of the IEP: Parents' Perspective. Scanlon, Cheryl A.; Joel Arick; Phelps, Neal // Exceptional Children;Feb1981, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p373 

    The article discusses key issues concerning the participation of parents in the creation of individualized education programs (IEP) for handicapped children in Oregon. Key issues discussed include the degree to which parents who are committee participants in public schools have been active in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics