Undefeated dualism

Bogardus, Tomas
September 2013
Philosophical Studies;Sep2013, Vol. 165 Issue 2, p445
Academic Journal
In the standard thought experiments, dualism strikes many philosophers as true, including many non-dualists. This 'striking' generates prima facie justification: in the absence of defeaters, we ought to believe that things are as they seem to be, i.e. we ought to be dualists. In this paper, I examine several proposed undercutting defeaters for our dualist intuitions. I argue that each proposal fails, since each rests on a false assumption, or requires empirical evidence that it lacks, or overgenerates defeaters. By the end, our prima facie justification for dualism remains undefeated. I close with one objection concerning the dialectical role of rebutting defeaters, and I argue that the prospects for a successful rebutting defeater for our dualist intuitions are dim. Since dualism emerges undefeated, we ought to believe it.


Related Articles

  • THE CONCEIVABILITY ARGUMENT AND THE INTUITION OF DUALISM. Polcyn, Karol // Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy;Jun2010, Issue 24, p90 

    Information on the author's opinion on conceivability argument and the intuition of dualism is discussed. The author argues that David Papineau's assumption that individuals are all in the grip of the intuition of dualism strengthens physicalism further by leading to the refutation of the...

  • Good Dualism and Private Knowledge. Malik, Luke // International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research;2011, Vol. 5 Issue 2, pV2-98 

    This paper investigates the consistency of holding two dualist propositions, relating to consciousness, and one physicalist proposition, relating to knowledge. We conclude that accepting all three leads to an absurdity. We contend that a dualist who is true to her dualist principles, the "good...

  • Through Thick and Thin with Ned Block: How Not to Rebut the Property Dualism Argument. O’Sullivan, Brendan // Philosophia;Dec2008, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p531 

    In “Max Black’s Objection to Mind–Body Identity,” Ned Block seeks to offer a definitive treatment of property dualism arguments that exploit modes of presentation. I will argue that Block’s central response to property dualism is confused. The property dualist...

  • Transcendental Priority and Deleuzian Normativity. A Reply to James Williams. Reynolds, Jack // Deleuze Studies;2008, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p101 

    I am grateful that someone whose work I greatly admire could be the philosopher to so eloquently and succinctly cut to the heart of the problem that I posed in the previous issue of Deleuze Studies. James Williams' critical reply leaves me, prima facie, confronted by a stark alternative: either...

  • PHILOSOPHICAL ABSTRACTS.  // Review of Metaphysics;Mar2005, Vol. 58 Issue 3, p703 

    Presents abstracts of articles on philosophy. "Thomas As Commentator in Some Programs of NeoThomism: A Reply to Kaczor," by Mark D. Jordan, from the Summer 2004 issue of the periodical "American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly"; "What Is a Problem for All Is a Problem for None: Substance...

  • Solitude without Souls: Why Peter Unger hasn't Established Substance Dualism. Bynoe, Will; Jones, Nicholas // Philosophia;Mar2013, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p109 

    Unger has recently argued that if you are the only thinking and experiencing subject in your chair, then you are not a material object. This leads Unger to endorse a version of Substance Dualism according to which we are immaterial souls. This paper argues that this is an overreaction. We argue...

  • The compatibility of property dualism and substance materialism. Yang, Eric // Philosophical Studies;Dec2015, Vol. 172 Issue 12, p3211 

    Several philosophers have argued that property dualism and substance materialism are incompatible positions. Recently, Susan Schneider has provided a novel version of such an argument, claiming that the incompatibility will be evident once we examine some underlying metaphysical issues. She...

  • IS NEUROSCIENCE ADEQUATE AS THE FORTHCOMING "MINDSCIENCE"? Manzotti, Riccardo; Moderato, Paolo // Behavior & Philosophy;2010, Vol. 38, p1 

    The widespread use of brain imaging techniques encourages conceiving of neuroscience as the forthcoming ''mindscience.'' Perhaps surprisingly for many, this conclusion is still largely unwarranted. The present paper surveys various shortcomings of neuroscience as a putative ''mindscience.'' The...

  • On the supposed limits of physicalist theories of mind. Dorsey, Jonathan // Philosophical Studies;Sep2011, Vol. 155 Issue 2, p207 

    Is physicalism compatible with either panpsychism or so-called 'fundamental mentality'? Minimal physicalism, I contend, is compatible with both. We should therefore jettison the 'No Fundamental Mentality' constraint, a proposed constraint on the definition of 'the physical', not to mention the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics