'Fortress Europe': Compliance of the Dublin II Regulation with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Lenart, Joanna
July 2012
Merkourios;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 75, p04
Academic Journal
Recently, the Dublin II Regulation, a cornerstone of the emerging Common European Asylum System, has been gravely criticised, especially in context of the living conditions and general situation of asylum seekers in Greece. The main concerns regard the potential noncompliance of the Dublin II Regulation with the European Convention on Human Rights ('ECHR'), particularly with Article 3 - the prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. This article examines the competing views in this respect. It analyses the relationship between EU law and the ECHR, protection of rights of refugees under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and main deficiencies of the Dublin II Regulation. The analysis starts with the non-equivalent protection of asylum seekers throughout the EU and finishes with the very limited definition of a family member and case law relevant to the principle of non-refoulement. This article concludes that the Dublin II Regulation per se cannot be deemed noncompliant with the ECHR. However, it emphasises the urgent need to change relevant legal provisions, or at least enforcement, and proposes possible solutions therein.


Related Articles

  • IH (Appellant) v. The Secretary Of State for the Home Department (Respondent).  // International Journal of Refugee Law;Jul2009, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p308 

    The article discusses a court case involving an appeal by a citizen of Eritrea for asylum and humanitarian protection in Great Britain. In IH v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department, the appeal was dismissed in respect of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The...

  • Europe rejects the 'Australian Solution'. Tan, Nikolas Feith // Eureka Street;May2015, Vol. 25 Issue 9, p35 

    The article reports that Europe has rejected the Australian Solution a way to stop irregular migration include boat turn-backs, offshore processing and offshore resettlement. It states that Australia has received criticism from human rights bodies for its asylum policy. It mentions that primary...

  • The Discretion of States in the Dublin III System for Determining Responsibility for Examining Applications for Asylum: What Remains of the Sovereignty and Humanitarian Clauses After the Interpretations of the ECtHR and the CJEU? Morgades-Gil, Sílvia // International Journal of Refugee Law;Oct2015, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p433 

    In 2011, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in its judgment on the case of MSS v Belgium and Greece, and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its judgment on NS and ME, established an interpretation of the so-called sovereignty clause of Regulation 343/2003 (Dublin II) by...

  • No thanks for the help. Thompson, Christopher // New Statesman;4/16/2007, Vol. 136 Issue 4840, p19 

    The article reports that the British Home Office allowed Sudanese officials to interrogate refugees in Darfur who have sought asylum in Great Britain. The piece describes several instances where Darfuris were interviewed by officials of the government they had fled, encounters made possible by...

  • Legal Constraints on the International Community's Responses to Gross Violations of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in Kosovo, East Timor, and Chechnya. Cerone, John O. // Human Rights Review;7/1/2001-9/1/2001, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p19 

    Examines the legal constraints on the international community's responses to gross violations of human rights and humanitarian law in Kosovo, East Timor and Chechnya. Nature of the international legal system; Relevant provisions of human rights and humanitarian law; Legal constraints and...

  • Sri Lanka must be pursued for war crimes.  // Green Left Weekly;5/25/2011, Issue 880, p20 

    The article focuses on the report by the three-person panel regarding the human rights issues in Sri Lanka which found credible allegations that the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) committed serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law.

  • asylum seekers.  // Community Care;4/10/2003, Issue 1467, p8 

    This article reports that an inquiry has cleared a firm that houses asylum seekers of intimidation, breaching people's human rights and providing inadequate accommodation. Landmark Liverpool Ltd was investigated over its contract with the National Asylum Support Service (NASS) to house single...

  • The Threat of Destitution as a Deterrent against Asylum Seeking in the European Union. Da Lomba, Sylvie // Refuge;Winter2006, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p81 

    The problematization of asylum has detrimentally impacted on the provision of support for asylum seekers in host countries. The threat of destitution has become instrumental in restrictive asylum policies and is increasingly used as a deterrent against asylum seeking. The EU experience reveals...

  • The European Court of Human Rights and the right of refugees and other persons in need of protection to family reunion. Lambert, H // International Journal of Refugee Law;Summer99, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p427 

    While article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR50) does not provide an absolute right for individuals, it does impose certain obligations on States. In any dispute arising under this article, the European Court of Human Rights must balance two sets of competing interests, the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics