A Dialogue on Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation

Scalia, Antonin; Manning, John F.
November 2012
George Washington Law Review Arguendo;Nov2012, Vol. 80 Issue 6, p1610
Academic Journal
The article focuses on several issues being raised concerning statutory and constitutional interpretation in the U.S. It mentions the use of legislative history as well as the legislators' purpose in passing a bill. It also mentions the difference between the absurdity doctrine and the doctrines that allow interpreters to use unenacted purpose or intent in trumping the text.


Related Articles

  • Our Unsettled Ninth Amendment: An Essay on Unenumerated Rights and the Impossibility of Textualism. Seidman, Louis Michael // California Law Review;Dec2010, Vol. 98 Issue 6, p2129 

    The Ninth Amendment�our resident anarchic and sarcastic "constitutional jester"�mocks the effort of scholars and judges alike to tame and normalize constitutional law. The Amendment stubbornly resists control. It stands as a paradoxical, textual monument to the impossibility of...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL DISUSE OR DESUETUDE: THE CASE OF ARTICLE V. ALBERT, RICHARD // Boston University Law Review;May2014, Vol. 94 Issue 3, p1029 

    Article V of the United States Constitution is in decline and disuse. Studies of comparative formal amendment difficulty, the decelerating pace of Article V amendments, and the relative infrequency of Article V amendments in the modern era - the most recent having been ratified roughly one...

  • ORIGINALISM, ABORTION, AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT. Koppelman, Andrew // Columbia Law Review;Nov2012, Vol. 112 Issue 7, p1917 

    Does an originalist reading of the Thirteenth Amendment support a right to abortion? Not long ago a negative answer seemed obvious enough to make the question silly. Since then, however, originalism has become more sophisticated. It is now understood that original meaning, not original intent,...

  • Democrats vs. the First Amendment.  // National Review;10/6/2014, Vol. 66 Issue 18, p14 

    The author criticizes an attempt by Democrats in the U.S. Senate to approve a constitutional amendment that would give Congress added powers to censor newspapers, television, and other media. The author regards the measure as an attack on the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that would...

  • In the Beginning. Karlan, Pamela S. // Boston Review;Sep/Oct2010, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p7 

    This article discusses the preservation of the U.S. Constitution and the formal amendments that reshaped the fundamental law through the years since its development in 1787. It explores the principles the surround the Constitution including liberty, equality and opportunity. It highlights the...

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Second Amendment Is Back, Baby. Neily, Clark // Cato Supreme Court Review;2008, p127 

    The article discusses the provisions of the Second Amendment of the Constitution in the U.S. It examines how the constitutional rights and the scope of the Second Amendment are deemed unclear and need to be sort out through subsequent litigation. It highlights the District of Columbia versus...

  • Taxing Article V: When "the People" Liked Tax Amendments, to When They Didn't, 1900 through 2013. Myrick, Amy // Journal of Law & Politics;Fall2014, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p223 

    The New Deal transformed the constitutional landscape - that much we know. But some transformative aspects have been overlooked, among them the sea change in how Americans thought and talked about using Article V to formally amend the Constitution's text. This change was dramatic where economic...

  • GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT. Tsesis, Alexander // Columbia Law Review;Nov2012, Vol. 112 Issue 7, p1641 

    Although the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified more than a century and a half ago, courts have yet to delve into its relevance to gender discrimination. This oversight is unfortunate given the extent to which jurisprudence about another Reconstruction Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, has...

  • The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act: Regulating Violence or Restricting Expression?  // Free Speech Yearbook;1997, Vol. 35, p56 

    An essay is presented on the constitutionality of the U.S. Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE). It explores the legislative history of FACE that helped in the rationale of the U.S. government. It also discusses numerous arguments on FACE, the areas of future of FACE, and balanced...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics