TITLE

Defrauded lender could not sustain negligence claim against bank because banks do not owe non-customers a duty of care

AUTHOR(S)
BANICH, TERENCE G.
PUB. DATE
November 2013
SOURCE
Banking Law Journal;Nov/Dec2013, Vol. 130 Issue 10, p952
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the Court of Appeals of Arizona's ruling in the 2013 case Gilbert Tuscany Lender LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank which deals with an apparent lack of a duty of care between banks and non-customers and its impact on the ability of a defrauded lender to sustain a negligence claim against a bank. Other topics include allegedly falsified invoices, several sections of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, and criminal investigations in America.
ACCESSION #
91711495

 

Related Articles

  • Court Limits Counsel Fees Where and that they were in some meaningful sense culpable Suit Was Essentially Uncontested.  // Lender Liability Law Report;Jul2012, Vol. 26 Issue 7, p7 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a U.S. court had ordered Wells Fargo Bank to limit its legal fees to 10,000 U.S. dollars. In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Humphrey Lumber Corp., the appellant filed a complaint against the latter after it defaulted on a note and guaranty for loan from the...

  • Overreaction or onslaught? Taylor, Greg // ABA Banking Journal;Oct2010, Vol. 102 Issue 10, p65 

    The article reports on the effect of the federal district court's ruling on the court case Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank NA on the banking industry in San Francisco, California. It notes that the ruling has raised questions on existing overdraft protection programs. It states that the court's...

  • LENDER LIABILITY -- BANKS WIN TWO.  // Bankers Letter of the Law;Sep2011, Vol. 45 Issue 9, p3 

    The article discusses two court cases dealing with lending liability in which the courts sided with the banks. In Interpharm Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, the district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed the claims of the firm accusing the bank of wrongful conduct....

  • Bank Owes No Duty of Care to Non-Customer Under BSA.  // BSA/AML Update;11/15/2013, Vol. 9 Issue 22, p3 

    The article discusses the findings of the Arizona Court of Appeals in the case Gilbert Tuscany Lender LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank NA. Tthe court found that the bank did not owe a duty of care on the company under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The opinion of judge Patricia A. Orozco is discussed. A...

  • Circuit Split Emerges over National Banks' Citizenship. Whiting, Gran F. // Litigation News;Winter2012, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p22 

    The article discusses a case Wells Fargo Bank NA v. WMR e-PIN LLC, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for Eighth Circuit announced that location of a national bank's main office rather than its principal place of business determines citizenship for diversity purposes. Wells Fargo's dual...

  • BANKING BRIEFS. BANICH, TERENCE G. // Banking Law Journal;May2014, Vol. 131 Issue 5, p446 

    The article presents U.S. banking industry news briefs. The Connecticut Supreme Court determined that an economic loss doctrine does not bar legal claims under the state's Unfair Trade Practices Act. The Florida District Court of Appeals ruled that there was a genuine issue of material fact...

  • MI: Mall Case May Go To Michigan Supreme Court.  // GPP eNews;2/17/2012, p1 

    The article reports that the Wells Fargo Bank vs Cherry Land Mall Limited Partnership case was considered to be transferred to the Michigan Supreme Court from its trial in a local Michigan court.

  • Wells Fargo Faces Suit Concerning Loan-Mod Denials. Wack, Kevin // American Banker;12/12/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 189, p10 

    The article discusses a federal lawsuit filed in California against Wells Fargo bank for allegedly denying loan modifications to eligible homeowners in violation of the national mortgage settlement and notes the class-action lawsuit that involves World Savings Bank's Pick-a-Payment mortgages.

  • AT-WILL, BE KUHL. PANNABECKER, JAMES H. // Bankers Letter of the Law;Aug2013, Vol. 47 Issue 8, p1 

    The article discusses a court case between former First State Bank of Pinedale president Bill Kuhl and Wells Fargo Bank. The case referred to a dispute over his employment status at Wells Fargo since the bank purchased First State Bank on July 1, 2008, where the deal revealed that his employment...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics