TITLE

Bayesian imputation of non-chosen attribute values in revealed preference surveys

AUTHOR(S)
Washington, Simon; Ravulaparthy, Srinath; Rose, John M.; Hensher, David; Pendyala, Ram
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
Journal of Advanced Transportation;Jan2014, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p48
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY Obtaining attribute values of non-chosen alternatives in a revealed preference context is challenging because non-chosen alternative attributes are unobserved by choosers, chooser perceptions of attribute values may not reflect reality, existing methods for imputing these values suffer from shortcomings, and obtaining non-chosen attribute values is resource intensive. This paper presents a unique Bayesian (multiple) Imputation Multinomial Logit model that imputes unobserved travel times and distances of non-chosen travel modes based on random draws from the conditional posterior distribution of missing values. The calibrated Bayesian (multiple) Imputation Multinomial Logit model imputes non-chosen time and distance values that convincingly replicate observed choice behavior. Although network skims were used for calibration, more realistic data such as supplemental geographically referenced surveys or stated preference data may be preferred. The model is ideally suited for imputing variation in intrazonal non-chosen mode attributes and for assessing the marginal impacts of travel policies, programs, or prices within traffic analysis zones. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ACCESSION #
93524841

 

Related Articles

  • Sparsity and the Bayesian perspective. Starck, J.-L.; Donoho, D. L.; Fadili, M. J.; Rassat, A. // Astronomy & Astrophysics / Astronomie et Astrophysique;Apr2013, Vol. 552 Issue 1, p1 

    Sparsity has recently been introduced in cosmology for weak-lensing and cosmic microwave background (CMB) data analysis for different applications such as denoising, component separation, or inpainting (i.e., filling the missing data or the mask). Although it gives very nice numerical results,...

  • Clarifying missing at random and related definitions, and implications when coupled with exchangeability. MEALLI, FABRIZIA; RUBIN, DONALD B. // Biometrika;Dec2015, Vol. 102 Issue 4, p995 

    We clarify the key concept of missingness at random in incomplete data analysis. We first distinguish between data being missing at random and the missingness mechanism being a missing-at-random one, which we call missing always at random and which is more restrictive.We further discuss how, in...

  • Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research. III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods. Greenland, Sander // International Journal of Epidemiology;Aug2010, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p1116 

    A correction to the article "Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research. III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods" that was published in the 2009 issue is presented.

  • Practical Approaches to Principal Component Analysis in the Presence of Missing Values. Ilin, Alexander; Raiko, Tapani // Journal of Machine Learning Research;7/1/2010, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p1957 

    No abstract available.

  • Reality Check: Combining Choice Experiments with Market Data to Estimate the Importance of Product Attributes. Feit, Eleanor McDonnell; Beltramo, Mark A.; Feinberg, Fred M. // Management Science;May2010, Vol. 56 Issue 5, p785 

    Discrete choice models estimated using hypothetical choices made in a survey setting (i.e., choice experiments) are widely used to estimate the importance of product attributes in order to make product design and marketing mix decisions. Choice experiments allow the researcher to estimate...

  • The Effects of Consequentiality in Binary- and Multinomial-Choice Surveys. Interis, Matthew G.; Petrolia, Daniel R. // Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics;Aug2014, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p201 

    We examine the effect of respondent perceptions of consequentiality on a split-sample binary-choice/multinomial-choice stated-preference survey. We fail to observe the knife-edge results predicted in the consequentiality literature in the binary-choice data but do observe them in the...

  • Managing nonignorable missing data with clustered multinomial responses. Wang, Mu-Cyun; Lin, I-Feng // Statistical Modelling: An International Journal;Dec2015, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p548 

    Clustered multinomial responses are common in public health studies. In this situation, the baseline logit random effects model is usually suggested as a general modelling approach. When nonignorable missing outcomes exist, naïve methods such as complete case analysis or likelihood methods...

  • Testing the null of a low dimensional growth model. Jensen, Peter Sandholt // Empirical Economics;Feb2010, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p193 

    Applied growth researchers face a sample with more regressors than observations when using cross-country data. In this paper, we examine simple procedures for testing if a true submodel has been found. Specifically, we examine three tests that can be used to test a low dimensional growth model...

  • Bayesian Estimation of Multinomial Processing Tree Models with Heterogeneity in Participants and Items. Matzke, Dora; Dolan, Conor; Batchelder, William; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan // Psychometrika;Mar2015, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p205 

    Multinomial processing tree (MPT) models are theoretically motivated stochastic models for the analysis of categorical data. Here we focus on a crossed-random effects extension of the Bayesian latent-trait pair-clustering MPT model. Our approach assumes that participant and item effects combine...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics