TITLE

Economic man and diffused sovereignty: a critique of Australia's asylum regime

AUTHOR(S)
Welch, Michael
PUB. DATE
February 2014
SOURCE
Crime, Law & Social Change;Feb2014, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p81
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Governing asylum, especially in Western migration zones, is correctly understood as an expression of centralized state power, or sovereignty. Still, there is much to learn about asylum regimes by turning critical attention to how sovereignty is de-centralized. This critique focuses on Australia where sovereign power is diffused into privatized detention, outsourced decision-making, and offshore processing. The reliance on diffused sovereignty, the article contends, is a maneuver by the state as it attempts to evade legal obligations enshrined in refugee law and human rights. As discussed throughout, economic mentalities figure prominently in the Australian asylum system. In particular, the notion of economic man continues to shape the government's perception of asylum seekers as being highly rational and responsible, thus manageable by way of deterrence and prolonged detention. Special attention is given to recent disputes between the High Court and the then Gillard government with respect to the processing of refugees.
ACCESSION #
93871541

 

Related Articles

  • No thanks for the help. Thompson, Christopher // New Statesman;4/16/2007, Vol. 136 Issue 4840, p19 

    The article reports that the British Home Office allowed Sudanese officials to interrogate refugees in Darfur who have sought asylum in Great Britain. The piece describes several instances where Darfuris were interviewed by officials of the government they had fled, encounters made possible by...

  • The Right to Leave. Marshall, Eliot // New Republic;10/20/73, Vol. 169 Issue 16, p9 

    Discusses the international law of the right to travel under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. Freedom of an individual to move and reside within the borders of each state; Ability of an individual to leave any country and to return to his...

  • The Discretion of States in the Dublin III System for Determining Responsibility for Examining Applications for Asylum: What Remains of the Sovereignty and Humanitarian Clauses After the Interpretations of the ECtHR and the CJEU? Morgades-Gil, Sílvia // International Journal of Refugee Law;Oct2015, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p433 

    In 2011, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in its judgment on the case of MSS v Belgium and Greece, and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its judgment on NS and ME, established an interpretation of the so-called sovereignty clause of Regulation 343/2003 (Dublin II) by...

  • asylum seekers.  // Community Care;4/10/2003, Issue 1467, p8 

    This article reports that an inquiry has cleared a firm that houses asylum seekers of intimidation, breaching people's human rights and providing inadequate accommodation. Landmark Liverpool Ltd was investigated over its contract with the National Asylum Support Service (NASS) to house single...

  • The Threat of Destitution as a Deterrent against Asylum Seeking in the European Union. Da Lomba, Sylvie // Refuge;Winter2006, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p81 

    The problematization of asylum has detrimentally impacted on the provision of support for asylum seekers in host countries. The threat of destitution has become instrumental in restrictive asylum policies and is increasingly used as a deterrent against asylum seeking. The EU experience reveals...

  • The European Court of Human Rights and the right of refugees and other persons in need of protection to family reunion. Lambert, H // International Journal of Refugee Law;Summer99, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p427 

    While article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR50) does not provide an absolute right for individuals, it does impose certain obligations on States. In any dispute arising under this article, the European Court of Human Rights must balance two sets of competing interests, the...

  • Measuring the health impact of human rights violations related to Australian asylum policies and practices: a mixed methods study. Johnston, Vanessa; Allotey, Pascale; Mulholland, Kim; Markovic, Milica // BMC International Health & Human Rights;2009, Vol. 9, p1 

    Background: Human rights violations have adverse consequences for health. However, to date, there remains little empirical evidence documenting this association, beyond the obvious physical and psychological effects of torture. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether Australian...

  • Accession nation refugees win last gasp housing and benefits reprieve. Taylor, Amy // Community Care;5/6/2004, Issue 1521, p16 

    Reports on the move by the British government to reverse its decision to deny support to asylum seekers from the 10 European Union accession countries in 2004. Concern of campaigners about unemployed nationals who are not entitled to benefits or social housing; Opinion of Richard Lumley, an...

  • Mandatory Detention: Protection or Punishment.  // Australian Nursing Journal;Mar2002, Vol. 9 Issue 8, p26 

    Discusses the policy of the Australian government on the detention of asylum seekers. Humanitarian migration in Australia; Alternatives to detention; Issue on human rights.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics