TITLE

Court defers ruling on human rights

PUB. DATE
March 2003
SOURCE
Community Care;3/13/2003, Issue 1463, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the decision of the Court Appeals to overturn a High Court ruling on human rights of asylum seekers. Information on the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act of 2002 in Great Britain; Reaction of Lord Chief Justice Lord Woolf to the ruling.
ACCESSION #
9395482

 

Related Articles

  • European Court of Human Rights Third Section Decision as to the Admissibility of Application No. 43844/98 T.I. v. United Kingdom.  // International Journal of Refugee Law;Apr2000, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p244 

    Details the decision of the European Court of Human Rights to the argument set by a Sri Lankan national born applicant who was held on Campsfield House Detention Centre for allegations of being connected with the terrorist organisation Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. Discussion of the facts...

  • Asylum Denied Man Claiming Indian Police Beat Him.  // India -- West;2/11/2011, Vol. 36 Issue 12, pA27 

    The article reports on the denial of Ratnesh Sharma's political asylum request by federal appeals court in San Francisco, California after he was beaten by police due to his father's writing on Sikh separatist in India.

  • The Discretion of States in the Dublin III System for Determining Responsibility for Examining Applications for Asylum: What Remains of the Sovereignty and Humanitarian Clauses After the Interpretations of the ECtHR and the CJEU? Morgades-Gil, Sílvia // International Journal of Refugee Law;Oct2015, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p433 

    In 2011, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in its judgment on the case of MSS v Belgium and Greece, and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its judgment on NS and ME, established an interpretation of the so-called sovereignty clause of Regulation 343/2003 (Dublin II) by...

  • No thanks for the help. Thompson, Christopher // New Statesman;4/16/2007, Vol. 136 Issue 4840, p19 

    The article reports that the British Home Office allowed Sudanese officials to interrogate refugees in Darfur who have sought asylum in Great Britain. The piece describes several instances where Darfuris were interviewed by officials of the government they had fled, encounters made possible by...

  • High Court ruling boost for child asylum seekers.  // Community Care;2/25/2010, Issue 1807, p6 

    The article offers information on a High Court ruling in which the judge, Justice Collins criticized governments policy in context with the removal of asylum seeking children from Great Britain without a prior notice to their parents.

  • Lords' decision puts pressure on housing.  // Community Care;2/12/2004, Issue 1509, p10 

    Reports on the negative effect of a British House of Lords ruling that gives freedom to asylum seekers after they have been granted asylum on housing in Great Britain. Details of the performance of the National Asylum Support Service in the country.

  • asylum seekers.  // Community Care;4/10/2003, Issue 1467, p8 

    This article reports that an inquiry has cleared a firm that houses asylum seekers of intimidation, breaching people's human rights and providing inadequate accommodation. Landmark Liverpool Ltd was investigated over its contract with the National Asylum Support Service (NASS) to house single...

  • The Threat of Destitution as a Deterrent against Asylum Seeking in the European Union. Da Lomba, Sylvie // Refuge;Winter2006, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p81 

    The problematization of asylum has detrimentally impacted on the provision of support for asylum seekers in host countries. The threat of destitution has become instrumental in restrictive asylum policies and is increasingly used as a deterrent against asylum seeking. The EU experience reveals...

  • The European Court of Human Rights and the right of refugees and other persons in need of protection to family reunion. Lambert, H // International Journal of Refugee Law;Summer99, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p427 

    While article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR50) does not provide an absolute right for individuals, it does impose certain obligations on States. In any dispute arising under this article, the European Court of Human Rights must balance two sets of competing interests, the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics