Exploring Sanctioned and Unsanctioned Lies in Interpersonal Deception

Feeley, Thomas H.
September 1996
Communication Research Reports;Fall1996, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p164
Academic Journal
Explores individuals' motivation to lie in experimental lie detection. Characteristics of deception; Analysis of the two types of deception; Comparison between the two types of lies; Difference between threat and challenge appraisals.


Related Articles

  • Detecting Infrequent Deception. Murphy, Kevin R. // Journal of Applied Psychology;Nov87, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p611 

    Develops equations showing that extraordinarily high levels of accuracy of polygraph and similar devices would be needed to detect infrequent deception. Debate over the accuracy of deception detection methods; Analysis of the problem of detecting deception in terms of the base rate and the...

  • The Comparison Question Test: Does It Work and If So How? Offe, Heinz; Offe, Susanne // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);Jun2007, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p291 

    In a mock crime study of the comparison question test (CQT), 35 subjects decided to participate as guilty and 30 as innocent. Two conditions were varied: Explaining the comparison questions in the pretest interview and re-discussing comparison questions between charts. Higher identification...

  • Detecting True Lies: Police Officers' Ability to Detect Suspects' Lies. Mann, Samantha; Vrij, Alden; Bull, Ray // Journal of Applied Psychology;Feb2004, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p137 

    Ninety-nine police officers, not identified in previous research as belonging to groups that are superior in lie detection, attempted to detect truths and lies told by suspects during their videotaped police interviews. Accuracy rates were higher than those typically found in deception research...

  • Time and Encoding Effects in the Concealed Knowledge Test. Seymour, Travis L.; Fraynt, Becky R. // Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback;Sep2009, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p177 

    Although the traditional “lie detector” test is used frequently in forensic contexts, it has (like most test of deception) some limitations. The concealed knowledge test (CKT) focuses on participants’ recognition of privileged knowledge rather than lying per-se and has been...

  • The Focal Account: Indirect Lie Detection Need Not Access Unconscious, Implicit Knowledge. Street, Chris N. H.; Richardson, Daniel C. // Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied;Dec2015, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p342 

    People are poor lie detectors, but accuracy can be improved by making the judgment indirectly. In a typical demonstration, participants are not told that the experiment is about deception at all. Instead, they judge whether the speaker appears, say, tense or not. Surprisingly, these indirect...

  • Deceiving the law.  // Nature Neuroscience;Nov2008, Vol. 11 Issue 11, p1231 

    The author reflects on the significance of neuroscience-based lie-detection technology on detecting deception. He presented the case which happened in a court near Mumbai, India which became the first to admit a neuroscience-based lie-detection technique as evidence. He noted that there is no...

  • The Physiological Detection of Deception. Waid, William M.; Orne, Martin T. // American Scientist;Jul/Aug82, Vol. 70 Issue 4, p402 

    Examines the cognitive, social and personality processes involved in the physiological response accompanying deception in line with the accuracy of polygraph tests. Nature of field polygraph testing; Variables affecting the accuracy of polygraph tests; Factors that evoke the physiological...

  • A Comparison of the Backster Scoring and Traditional Federal Scoring Using Computerized Analysis. Hedges, Keith; Deitchman, George; Samra, Dharam // Polygraph;2013, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p18 

    The article compares the backster scoring either-or rule (EOR) against the federal you-phase testing in areas such as false-positive results and deceptive bias. The backster you-phase uses a different sequence of questions, applies ratio and secondary rule methods, and uses comparison question...

  • DETECTING CONCEALED INFORMATION FROM A MOCK CRIME SCENARIO BY USING PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL AND RT-BASED MEASURES. VISU-PETRA, George; BUŞ, Ioan; MICLEA, Mircea // Cognitie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behavior;Mar2011, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p19 

    No abstract available.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics