DeFazio, Matthew J.
March 2013
Pace International Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p89
Academic Journal
Back in 1985, when knowledge of HIV began to spread, governments reacted by passing immigration laws to restrict the entry of HIV positive individuals. These laws required such individuals to either declare their HIV status or undergo mandatory HIV testing to secure entry. As justification for these initiatives, many countries claimed to be preserving the public health and their domestic economy. The United States, China, and Russia are three countries that have had, or still have, some form of HIV immigration restrictions. Initially, it may seem logical that preventing HIV positive individuals from entering a country will cut down on the spread of HIV and save the economy from health care costs. Nevertheless, an analysis of the HIV travel restrictions of these three countries will show that the public health and economic reasoning behind such laws is flawed because HIV is not spread by casual contact and because economic goals can be accomplished with less restrictive means. Moreover, this article will further reveal that HIV travel restrictions contribute to several health concerns and create issues with confidentially and stigmatization. In the end, a comparative analysis of these three countries, with specific attention paid to their successes and failures, reveals that the best system is one that works on both an international and domestic level. On the international level, border testing must be voluntary, confidential, and informed. It should also utilize pre and post test counseling, and not be used to restrict entry. On the domestic level, individual countries need to educate the public and create programs to address high-risk groups responsible for the rapid spread of HIV. In doing so, society will find not only that it is more effectively protecting itself from the spread of HIV, but also that it is protecting the HIV community from the stigma and discrimination that contributed to the rapid spread of HIV in the first place.


Related Articles

  • Global: HIV/AIDS-related travel restrictions -- UNAIDS/IOM statement and revision of International Health Regulations.  // Canadian HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review;Aug2004, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p37 

    Offers a look at HIV/AIDS-related travel restrictions issued by UNAIDS and the International Organization for Migration in 2004. Report that restrictions cannot be made on public health grounds; Restrictions based on economic grounds for long-term visitors or migrants; Implementation of...

  • Expect New INS Policy. Helquist, Michael // Advocate;3/27/90, Issue 547, p33 

    Reports that the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service made changes in the travel restrictions imposed on people with HIV seeking to enter the U.S. International pressure to completely drop the discriminatory regulations; List of groups boycotting an international AIDS convention due to...

  • Ban lifted on HIV positive visitors and immigrants to U.S.A.  // Empty Closet;Feb2010, Issue 431, p4A 

    The article reports on the lifting of a ban preventing HIV positive visitors and immigrants from entering the U.S. effective January 1, 2010.

  • Senate votes to repeal ban on HIV positive travelers, immigrants.  // Empty Closet;Aug2008, Issue 415, p4A 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Senate to approve the annulment of a law prohibiting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive visitors and immigrants from entering the country in July 2008. A provision to repeal the ban in the legislation to reauthorize the Presidents's...

  • U.S. lifts ban on persons with HIV entering the country.  // Infectious Disease News;Nov2009, Vol. 22 Issue 11, p6 

    This article reports on the legislation signed by U.S. President Barack Obama which will repeal restrictions on individuals human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) entering the country.

  • Virgin founder joins effort to end HIV-related travel restrictions.  // Africa Health;Sep2011, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p9 

    The article reports on the support given by British business pioneer Richard Branson to end the HIV-related travel restriction around the world.

  • US HIV travel ban lifted. Lavers, Michael K. // Xtra (Toronto);11/5/2009, Issue 653, p15 

    The article reports on the decision of U.S. President Barack Obama to end the U.S. HIV travel ban on October 30, 2009.

  • Immigration Reform Is Placed on Hold By Administration. Harding, Rick // Advocate;7/2/91, Issue 580, p18 

    Reports on the delay in the scheduled reversal of a federal policy in the U.S. the denies entry visas to foreigners who test positive for HIV antibodies. Criticism on the government for basing a public health decision on political considerations; Department of Health and Human Services' receipt...

  • Switzerland: exclusion of a healthcare professional because he was HIV-positive. Suter, Caroline // HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review;Oct2010, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p46 

    The article focuses on people living with HIV, who face barriers to occupations in the health care sector. It discusses a case in which a young man in Switzerland was denied access to training as an operating room technician (ORT) because he was HIV positive. It states that discrimination in the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics