What the Supreme Court is up to

April 2014
Moderate Voice;4/3/2014, p12
Blog Entry
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission. The case challenged the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) which instates the aggregate limit of contributing by individuals to federal candidates in any election cycle. Chief Justice John Robert suggested remaining committed to the project related to the deregulation of the U.S. political campaigns. Issues regarding the need of regulations in campaign contributions are presented.


Related Articles

  • Viewpoint: Future of U.S. Politics Hangs on Court Campaign Finance Decision. Cohen, Adam // Time.com;10/10/2013, p1 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and why he feels the future of U.S. politics rests on the Court's decision regarding campaign finance. Topics include U.S. laws governing donor limits to political...

  • SUPREME COURT OUT OF CONTROL: 'McCutcheon' Spurs Plutocracy's Moment. EXOO, CALVIN F.; EXOO, CHRISTIAN // Progressive Populist;5/1/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the impact created by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the case McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) on campaign funds. Topics discussed include the origins of the Supreme Court's ruling from the case Buckley v. Valeo, the author's view how the decision will...

  • WAR ON DEMOCRACY: SCOTUS Weighs in. BURNETT, BOB // Progressive Populist;5/15/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p11 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) court case as of May 2014, according to which political campaign contributions are extension of free speech under the U.S. First Amendment.

  • NEW RULES.  // State Legislatures;May2014, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p4 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case McCutcheon v. FEC in 2014 will affect state limits on donors' political contributions.

  • Them That's Got Shall Get. Kalet, Hank // Progressive Populist;5/1/2014, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p7 

    The article discusses the power given by the U.S. Supreme court to people with money after it struck down a federal law that limited the amount an individual could spend while supporting candidates during a single election cycle.

  • Get Over It: Campaign Finance Limits Don't Work. Oliphant, James // National Journal;10/19/2013, p8 

    The author ponders on the plan of the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down some parts of the campaign finance law which deals with limiting direct contributions to candidates. Information on the Supreme Court case, McCutcheon v. FEC, is presented. He believes that limits placed on expenditures that...

  • Supreme Court News. Davies, Lincoln L.; Hessick, F. Andrew // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Spring2014, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p13 

    The article presents news briefs related to the U.S. Supreme Court. Topics discussed, include several important decisions with administrative law implications; the court case, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, on campaign finance regulation; and other decisions that addressed federal...

  • BEFORE THE COURT IN MCCUTCHEON V. FEC.  // Supreme Court Debates;Nov2013, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p34 

    No abstract available.

  • McCutcheon Watch. Bradbery, Angela // Public Citizen News;Mar/Apr2014, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p1 

    The article discusses the court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission filed in the U.S. Supreme Court by businessman Shaun McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee (RNC) challenging the rules limiting the campaign funds in an election cycle. It mentions that the nonprofit...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics