TITLE

TROÅ KOVI UPRAVNOG SPORA

AUTHOR(S)
Šikić, Marko; Turudić, Marko
PUB. DATE
December 2013
SOURCE
Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveucilista u Rijeci;2013, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p841
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The paper analyzes the regulation of the institute of costs of administrative dispute. The main reason for writing this paper are the interventions in the institute made by the Act on Amendments to the Law on Administrative Disputes from December 2012. We view the changes as a big step back in regulating the costs of administrative disputes. The paper starts with a summary overview of the historical layout of the institute of administrative dispute costs in Croatia. Then, we describe the layout of the institute in the text of the Law on Administrative Disputes before and after the changes from December 2012. Finally, we conclude that the aforementioned changes were implemented to protect the national budget.
ACCESSION #
95544362

 

Related Articles

  • MINIMUM STANDARDS For Private Adjudicators? Knoll, Alfred P. // Dispute Resolution Journal;Apr-Jun1995, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p79 

    Discusses the qualifications for the training and certification of adjudicators. Threshold qualifications of adjudicators; Approach to providing educational opportunities to adjudicators; Plan issued by the California State Judicial Council for the court system of the state for the 21st century.

  • MEDIATION.  // Journal of the Australian & New Zealand Institute of Insurance &;Nov2010, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p24 

    The article presents information on mediation which is termed as the most practiced alternative dispute resolution method which allows two disputed parties to analyze the issue and reach a settlement with the intervention of a neutral third party. It mentions that mediation is voluntary,...

  • Imagining the Iraqi Future.  // Wilson Quarterly;Winter2004, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p93 

    Discusses several articles on issues concerning U.S. intervention in Iraq as of January 2004. Article on the efforts of the U.S. to eliminate the Baath regime and the constraints on Iraqi Islamism; Article on Iraqi Shiites; Article on the Iraq three-state solution.

  • The contingent fee--time for a change?: The hammer for the public interest. Shrager, David S. // ABA Journal;Dec85, Vol. 71 Issue 12, p36 

    Highlights the debate over lawyers' contingent fees in the United States. Benefits of contingent fees; Core reason for criticism of the contingent fee; Exemplar of dispute resolution.

  • ADR Will Become Growing Factor in Commercial Disputes. Stickel, Amy I. // Corporate Legal Times;Aug99, Vol. 9 Issue 93, p38 

    Loks into why large companies are hesitant to resolve to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in solving commercial disputes. Voluntary nature of ADR; Cost savings associated with ADR; Elimination of hurdles associated with trials such as complications of scheduling and uncertainty of the outcome.

  • ALL FOR ONE. Wetherfield, Alison // People Management;9/16/2004, Vol. 10 Issue 18, p19 

    Cites reforms in the rules for dispute resolution and employment tribunal service of the British Department of Constitutional Affairs. Enhancement of an early intervention role for the organization Acas; Introduction of mandatory forms for all parties from April 2005; Establishment of a strict...

  • Strengthening Schools: Involving Paraprofessionals in Crisis Prevention and Intervention. Allen, Melissa; Ashbaker, Betty Y. // Intervention in School & Clinic;Jan2004, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p139 

    Two important questions arise when creating a school crisis plan: (a) Who should be trained as part of the crisis team? and (b) What type of training will be the most effective and practical? The authors suggest that paraprofessionals are a valuable resource to consider for assisting with crisis...

  • Keep power in reserve for a crisis. Tolley, Steve // Money Marketing;2/10/2011, p24 

    The article reports on the suggestion made by the Treasury select committee that the British government should reserve power to intervene in times of crisis in which regulators fail to act.

  • DISPUTE SYSTEM DESIGN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA, ISRAEL AND CALIFORNIA. Martinez, Janet; Purcell, Sheila; Shaked-Gvili, Hagit; Mehta, Mohan // Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution;Spring2013, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p807 

    The article presents a comparison of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system in India, Israel and California. It informs that Israel has introduced the ADR into the judiciary system in 1992 after amending the Courts Act of 1984 and San Mateo, California court has introduced the ADR in order...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics