TITLE

Campaign Deform Act

PUB. DATE
June 1996
SOURCE
National Review;6/03/1996, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the McCain-Feingold legislation to reform campaign-financing in the U.S. The legislation assumes a public clamor for campaign-finance reform which Washington ignores only at its peril. But opposition for campaign-finance reform occurs only in Washington itself. The bill also assumes that there is "too much" money in American politics, and that its influence is a priori corrupting. There is a general view the legislation would fail to secure real changes and big spenders often lose political races.
ACCESSION #
9605247610

 

Related Articles

  • Can We Clean Up The Act? Buckley, Jr., William F. // National Review;10/27/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 20, p62 

    The article focuses on a bill proposed by U.S. Senator John McCain emphasizing the need to reform campaign finance in the U.S. The bill is being opposed by the majority of Senate Republicans. It stresses to outlaw soft money. The Republicans are demanding a bill to which the modifier reform can...

  • How Do You Like It Now? York, Byron // National Review;9/15/2003, Vol. 55 Issue 17, p22 

    This article focuses on the consequences of the passage of the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance-reform bill in the U.S. Michigan's Democratic senator Carl Levin predicted that the political landscape will change when this bill takes effect. The bill was passed on March 20, 2002. The law has led...

  • Bucks and Buckley. Buckley, James L. // National Review;9/27/1999, Vol. 51 Issue 18, p40 

    This article reflects on political debates concerning the proposed campaign finance reforms in the U.S. in 1999. The author discussed the content of the Federal Election Campaign Act which defines the limits in the campaign expenses of an independent political candidate. However, changes in the...

  • Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back. Miller, Ellen; Sifry, Micah // American Prospect;1/1/2001, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p8 

    Deals with importance of campaign finance reform legislation in the U.S. as of January 2001. Amount of money spent in the 2000 presidential elections; States which have reformed campaign finance legislation; Factors which hinder the reform of campaign finance legislation in other states such as...

  • State Campaign Finance Laws and Interest Group Electioneering Activities. Hogan, Robert E. // Journal of Politics;Aug2005, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p887 

    This paper examines the effects of campaign finance laws on interest group activities in state election campaigns. Specifically, the analysis considers how laws aimed at limiting contributions by interest groups influence the strategies used by these groups. In states where limits are low, it is...

  • Court OKs political spending cap. Richey, Warren; Chinni, Dante; Marlantes, Liz // Christian Science Monitor;6/26/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 148, p1 

    Focuses on approval by the United States Supreme Court for upholding federal limits on the amount of money political parties can spend in direct coordination with their candidates during election campaigns in the U.S. View that decision runs counter to the general trend in the court's...

  • RUNNING SCARED. King, Anthony // Atlantic;Jan1997, Vol. 279 Issue 1, p41 

    The article focuses on the logistical consequences of the electoral system in the United States. Details are given highlighting the amount of preparation, finance and effort which must be invested in maintaining public office. Challenges facing politicians such as short term lengths, campaign...

  • Beware of unintended consequences. Wilson // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;09/06/99, Vol. 29 Issue 11, p18 

    Comments on calls for another campaign reform in the United States which could breed another law like the Federal Elections Act of 1974 (FEA). Establishment of political action committees (PAC) by the FEA; Failure of PAC to do what they were intended to do; Role of PAC in focusing influence on...

  • Election Law Miscellany: Enforcement, Access to Debates, Qualification of Initiatives. Lowenstein, Daniel H. // Texas Law Review;Jun99, Vol. 77 Issue 7, p2001 

    Analyzes several political campaign issues in the United States. Cost of accessing ballots for initiatives; Disagreement to the contention that the exclusion of minor parties in political debates in a two-party system of government violates the democratic process; Analysis of the approaches to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics