TITLE

McCutcheon's Supreme Cynicism

AUTHOR(S)
Fischer, Brendan
PUB. DATE
June 2014
SOURCE
Progressive;Jun2014, Vol. 78 Issue 6, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the McCutcheon v. FEC case over the limit on an individual's direct contribution to political campaign funds. It says that the case was filed by Shaun McCutcheon against the Federal Election Commission (FEC), arguing that preventing him from spending more than 123,200 dollars in aggregate direct contributions to politicians, violates his free speech rights.
ACCESSION #
96327373

 

Related Articles

  • TIMING IS EVERYTHING: A NEW MODEL FOR COUNTERING CORRUPTION WITHOUT SILENCING SPEECH IN ELECTIONS. Levinson, Jessica A. // St. Louis University Law Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853 

    The article focuses on the consequences of the judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. U.S. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Information is provided on how the decision struck down all prohibitions on corporations' use of general funds to make campaign donations but failed to...

  • PUBLIC FUNDING AFTER DAVIS v. FEC: Is CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM THE STATES STILL LEGALLY VIABLE? Chen Li // George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal;Spring2010, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p279 

    The article looks at the legality of political campaign finance in the U.S. after the Davis v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) case. It examines the legal challenges brought against the state laws which help political candidates finance campaigns and curtail campaign spending, the logic that...

  • Money Talks.  // Time;Feb1982, Vol. 119 Issue 5, p66 

    The article reports on the impact of the ruling on the reform scheme enacted by Congress in 1976 as a means to clean up presidential and congressional elections in the U.S. It states that the Federal Election Commission has cited a legal spending ceiling of 1,000 dollars for independent groups...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);2/1/2010 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p17 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);2/1/2010 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p19 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • MCCUTCHEON V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION: AN UNLIKELY BLOCKBUSTER. Smith, Bradley A. // New York University Journal of Law & Liberty;2015, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p48 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission which concerns the aggregate limit on individual contributions to a federal candidate, and in which the plaintiff Shaun McCutcheon argued that the aggregate cap on total giving violated his First...

  • Failed Rescue: Why Davis v. FEC Signals the End to Effective Clean Elections. Crosland, E. Stewart // Washington & Lee Law Review;Jun2009, Vol. 66 Issue 3, p1265 

    The article discusses U.S. public campaign financing while focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court case, Davis v. FEC. It discusses Davis questions about the efficacy of a campaign finance reform measure known as Clean Elections by placing rescue funds. Furthermore, it analyzes whether after Davis'...

  • PUBLIC CORRUPTION CONCERNS AND COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY DEFINITION IN CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. Kimmel, Daaron // Chicago-Kent Law Review;2012, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p265 

    In determining the shape of the free speech rights and anti-corruption concerns that courts must balance in campaign finance cases, judges are influenced by their own underlying understandings of what an ideal democracy should look like. For judges to decide whether the government is...

  • The Money Game: Changing the Rules.  // Time;2/9/1976, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p10 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on campaign finance of the 1976 presidential candidates based on the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974. It says that the law's rule restricting the campaign contributions to 1000 dollars was left intact, though the court...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics