May 2014
Boston University Law Review;May2014, Vol. 94 Issue 3, p1029
Academic Journal
Article V of the United States Constitution is in decline and disuse. Studies of comparative formal amendment difficulty, the decelerating pace of Article V amendments, and the relative infrequency of Article V amendments in the modern era - the most recent having been ratified roughly one generation ago, and the next-most recent a generation earlier - confirm the impression that Article V's federalist supermajority requirements make the United States Constitution one of the world's most difficult to amend formally. The consequence of formal amendment difficulty has been to reroute political actors pursuing constitutional change from formal to informal amendment. The attendant decline and disuse of Article V as a vehicle for constitutional amendment suggests that Article V may itself have changed informally. In this Article, I explore whether Article V has been informally amended by constitutional desuetude.


Related Articles

  • THE FUNCTION OF ARTICLE V. HUQ, AZIZ Z. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Apr2014, Vol. 162 Issue 5, p1165 

    What good is Article V? The Constitution's amendment rule renders the text inflexible, countermajoritarian, and insensitive to important contemporary constituencies. Comparative empirical studies, moreover, show that textual rigidity is not only rare in other countries' organic documents, but...

  • How Do You Measure a Constitutional Moment? Using Algorithmic Topic Modeling To Evaluate Bruce Ackerman's Theory of Constitutional Change. TAYLOR YOUNG, DANIEL // Yale Law Journal;May2013, Vol. 122 Issue 7, p1990 

    Bruce Ackerman argues that major shifts in constitutional law can occur outside the Article V amendment process when there are unusually high levels of sustained popular attention to questions of constitutional significance. This Note develops a new empirical strategy to evaluate this claim...

  • The Other Amendments: Constitutional Amendments That Failed. Lynch, Michael J. // Law Library Journal;Spring2001, Vol. 93 Issue 2, p303 

    Mr. Lynch explores the status of proposed but unratified amendments to the United States Constitution. He also describes sources available for identifying amendments introduced in Congress-most of which are never proposed for ratification-and includes a bibliography of such sources.

  • Chronicle.  // America;2/4/1933, Vol. 48 Issue 18, p417 

    The section offers news briefs in the U.S. and other countries as of February 4, 1933. The Twentieth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified on January 23. The Lower House and the Senate of the Province of Buenos Aires passed a legislation suspending the payment of the foreign debt of...

  • The Twentieth Amendment.  // America;2/4/1933, Vol. 48 Issue 18, p421 

    The article offers highlights of the Twentieth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which was ratified by the States on January 23, 1933. Senator Norris of Nebraska reportedly had proposed this Amendment in 1923. The Amendment provides changes that would have allegedly minimized the political...

  • Our Unsettled Ninth Amendment: An Essay on Unenumerated Rights and the Impossibility of Textualism. Seidman, Louis Michael // California Law Review;Dec2010, Vol. 98 Issue 6, p2129 

    The Ninth Amendment�our resident anarchic and sarcastic "constitutional jester"�mocks the effort of scholars and judges alike to tame and normalize constitutional law. The Amendment stubbornly resists control. It stands as a paradoxical, textual monument to the impossibility of...

  • A Dialogue on Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation. Scalia, Antonin; Manning, John F. // George Washington Law Review Arguendo;Nov2012, Vol. 80 Issue 6, p1610 

    The article focuses on several issues being raised concerning statutory and constitutional interpretation in the U.S. It mentions the use of legislative history as well as the legislators' purpose in passing a bill. It also mentions the difference between the absurdity doctrine and the doctrines...

  • THE ORIGINAL (?) PUBLIC (?) MEANING OF "COMMERCE". Killenbeck, Mark R. // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;Nov2013, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p289 

    The article focuses on originalism in constitutional interpretation, which is a theory of constitutional law focusing on the original meaning of the statutes in questions, rather than on meanings that have evolved over time, and analyzes whether originals in the U.S. is parallel with key...

  • THE ARTICLE V CONVENTION PROCESS AND THE RESTORATION OF FEDERALISM. NATELSON, ROBERT G. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Summer2013, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p955 

    The article focuses on the restoration of federalism in the U.S. in 2013 and the rights afforded to states in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. Topics include the state power to adopt amendments, the ratification of constitutional amendments, and the constitutional limits on federal power....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics