TITLE

Slay the wage-and-hour dragon before it breathes class-action fire

AUTHOR(S)
Gunn, Beth A.; Sholkoff, Jack S.
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Jan2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article suggests several measures employers can take to avoid a costly class-action lawsuit in California. It suggests the use of arbitration agreements that include class-action waivers. It is reported that employer should comply the California Labor Code and applicable Industrial Welfare Commission wage orders.
ACCESSION #
96712960

 

Related Articles

  • Class actions called for in equal pay cases. Gainsbury, Sally // Public Finance;3/3/2006, p9 

    The article focuses on the call of the Great Britain Department of Trade and Industry's Women and Work Commission to consider seriously allowing class actions in equal pay cases. Labor unions have been urging for the introduction of this type of claim for some years. The details have to be...

  • Wage-Hour Collective Suits Pose Threat To Employers. Vogan, Joe; Smit, Peter // Grand Rapids Business Journal;10/14/2002, Vol. 20 Issue 41, p38 

    Discusses the growth of wage and hour collective actions in the U.S. causes of wage and hour suits; Statute governing wages of employees; ways to minimize the risk of liability.

  • DEFENSE STRATEGIES FOR MULTI-PARTY AND CLASS ACTION EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY LITIGATION. Maatman Jr., Gerald L. // Labor Law Journal;Fall2003, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p191 

    This article reports that multi-party and class action employment practices liability (EPL) litigation is an increasingly common type of corporate crisis. Large, publicly traded, consumer-oriented companies which are sensitive to negative publicity are especially vulnerable to class action EPL...

  • Fair Labor Standards Act . . . class actions. Ashman, Allan // American Bar Association Journal;Feb79, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p261 

    Reports on the 'opt-in' provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act in the U.S dealing with suits for nonpayment of statutorily required minimum wages and overtime compensation in the U.S. Dependency of the effectiveness of the opt-in procedure on the awareness of potential plaintiff about the...

  • How Many Cases Are Being Filed?  // National Underwriter / P&C;12/8/2008, Vol. 112 Issue 46, p13 

    The article provides a list of federal securities class actions being filed in 2007 in the U.S. According to the article, the Stanford Law School Class Action Clearinghouse has reported around 176 federal securities fraud lawsuits while employment and labor law firm, Littler Mendelson, revealed...

  • SMITH BARNEY CHANGING PAY. Chapelle, Tony // On Wall Street;Jan2007, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p19 

    The article reveals the plan of the Smith Barney brokerage unit to change the compensation of its advisors and sales assistants. The plan, which includes reduction of payouts to low-end producers, is aimed at complying with the labor laws. It also covers the use of payouts to offset salary...

  • The California Supreme Court to Decide Important Employment Class Action Cases. Lattin, John E. // Orange County Business Journal;6/16/2014, Vol. 37 Issue 24, p28 

    The article discusses risks faced by employers in California and the role of the California Supreme Court in changing the perception that the state is hostile to employers. Topics discussed include two employment-related class actions suit heard by the court on April 3, 2014 and probable impact...

  • Bank Fees for Cashing Paychecks May be Trouble for Employers Under California Labor Code Requiring Free Check Cashing. Bradshaw, David S.; Stone, Lawrence H.; Valenza, D. Gregory // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q1, p1 

    The article provides information on the possibility of bank fees for cashing paychecks to bring trouble to employers under the California Labor Code that requires free check cashing in its section 212. It mentions that employer should find another way to comply if the bank charges a fee. A class...

  • California Supreme Court: Labor Code PAGA Representative Actions Need Not Meet Class Action Requirements.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article reports on the California Supreme Court decision in Arias v. Superior Court (Angelo Dairy) on June 29, 2009 which allows employees to sue against their employers on behalf of themselves and other employees under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) without...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics