TITLE

OLDERMINORS, THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR (ALMOST ENTIRELY) NONLETHAL ARMS, AND THE RIGHT TO DEFEND LIFE

AUTHOR(S)
Volokh, Eugene
PUB. DATE
May 2011
SOURCE
Arizona State Law Journal;Summer2011, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p447
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the constitutional rights of minors in the U.S. Topics discusses include the rule which don't bar older minors access to nonlethal weapons in most states, unconstitutionality of the ban on older minors' possession of nonlethal weapons under rights to bear arms and old minors' right to defend their life. It mentions the Supreme Court case McConnell v. Federal Election Commission based on campaign finance law restricting minors to contribute money to political candidates.
ACCESSION #
97017851

 

Related Articles

  • High Court Strikes Down Ban on Minors' Giving. Keller, Bess // Education Week;1/7/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 16, p28 

    The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously overturned a section of the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law barring people under 18 from making political contributions, as of January 7, 2004. The ruling last month came as part of the high court's lengthy decision in the McConnell v. Federal Election...

  • BETWEEN ACCESS AND INFLUENCE: BUILDING A RECORD FOR THE NEXT COURT. STRAUSE, RENATA E. B.; TOKAJI, DANIEL P. // Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy;2014, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p179 

    This Article considers the evidence that should be collected and developed to support the next generation of reforms before a future Supreme Court. It discusses but ultimately sidesteps theoretical debates over rationales for reform, focusing instead on the practical questions likely to face...

  • A DEBATE ON CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE. Malloy, Tara; Smith, Bradley A. // Vermont Law Review;Summer2014, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p933 

    The article presents the views of former news director at Vermont Public Radio Ross Sneyd, senior counsel for the Campaign Legal Center Tara Malloy, and Bradley Smith, chairman of the Center for Competitive Politic on the campaign finance disclosure law in the U.S. Topics discussed include the...

  • The Supreme Court and Freedom of Speech, 2004-2005. Siegel, Paul // Free Speech Yearbook;2005, Vol. 42, p111 

    The article discusses several U.S. Supreme Court cases including Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. v. Federal Election Commission, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, and Multimedia Holdings Corporation v. Circuit Court of Florida 1624. It gives details of each case and the decisions. The judge...

  • Top 10 Supreme Court Decisions That Should Be Reversed.  // Human Events;1/16/2006, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p10 

    This article presents the top ten U.S. Supreme Court decisions that the author thinks should be reversed. Included here are Roe v. Wade, Lawrence v. Texas, Everson v. Board of Education, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, Grutter v. Bollinger, Plyer v. Doe, Baker v. Carr, and U.S. Term...

  • McCONNELL, UNITED STATES SENATOR, et al. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al.: appeal for the united states district for the district of columbia .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case McConnell, United States Senator, et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al., case number 02-1674, argued on September 8, 2003 and decided on December 10, 2003. Federal enactments designed to purge national politics of what is...

  • LOWER COURT HOLDING IN MCCUTCHEON V. FEC.  // Supreme Court Debates;Nov2013, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p8 

    No abstract available.

  • Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley: Constitutionality of Limits on Contributions in Ballot Measure Campaigns.  // California Law Review;Jul81, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1001 

    Discusses the constitutionality of limits on contributions in ballot measure campaigns in the case Citizens Against Rent Control versus City of Berkeley. Description of the U.S. Supreme Court's framework for the first amendment analysis of campaign spending laws; Information on Supreme Court...

  • New McCain Bill Violates 1st Amendment. Robinson, Matthew // Human Events;01/29/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p5 

    Discusses the free speech issues related to the campaign finance bill proposed by United States (U.S.) Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) and other legislators on January 22, 2001. Reaction from both Republican and Democratic Parties; Precedent from several U.S. Supreme Court cases; Information on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics