TITLE

Passing the Buckley

AUTHOR(S)
Rosen, Jeffrey
PUB. DATE
October 1997
SOURCE
New Republic;10/27/97, Vol. 217 Issue 17, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Contends that a successful campaign finance reform in the U.S. can only be made by revisiting the arguments used by the Supreme Court in its 1976 ruling on the case Buckley versus Valeo. Examination on the arguments of the Supreme Court; Distinction made by the Supreme Court between contributions and expenditures; Views of several Supreme Court justices as of October 1997 on the constitutionality of the limits on coordinated and uncoordinated campaign spending.
ACCESSION #
9710185585

 

Related Articles

  • SAVING BUCKLEY: CREATING A STABLE CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAMEWORK. Abraham, J. Robert // Columbia Law Review;May2010, Vol. 110 Issue 4, p1078 

    Since 1976, Buckley v. Valeo's contribution-expenditure distinction has been the touchstone of the campaign finance framework. Currently, lower courts are addressing the constitutionality of contribution limits to independent expenditure committees and some have adopted doctrinal approaches that...

  • What If...Buckley were Overturned? Morrison, Alan B. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer99, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p347 

    Discusses the effects of the United States (US) Supreme Court decision in the Buckley v. Valeo case on the election campaign finance in the US. Details on the decision; Basis for overruling the decision; Impact on other cases; Conclusion.

  • DOES MONEY STILL TALK? Halloran, Liz // U.S. News & World Report;2/27/2006, Vol. 140 Issue 7, p30 

    This article discusses the upcoming case before the U.S. Supreme Court that will determine the constitutionality of a Vermont Law that limits how much a political candidate can spend on a campaign. The court will also be indirectly reviewing a previous decision in Buckley v. Valeo that allows...

  • Discussing a Lifetime Of Achievements.  // Public Citizen News;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p8 

    An interview with retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award from consumer rights advocacy group Public Citizen, is presented. When asked if he still reads every opinion, he admits to doing so, finding some interesting reading. Justice...

  • THE SLOW, JUST, UNFINISHED DEMISE OF THE BUCKLEY COMPROMISE: Randall v. Sorrell, 126 S. Ct. 2479 (2006). Coleman, James // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2006, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p427 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Randall versus Sorrell which dealt with a Vermont's law concerning contributions to campaign funds with reference to Buckley versus Valeo. The Court ruled that Vermont's contribution limits violated the First Amendment because they were too low....

  • GLITTERING GENERALITIES AND HISTORICAL MYTHS. Paul Stevens, Justice John // University of Louisville Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p419 

    In this article, the author focuses on the glittering generalities as well as the historical myths reflected in the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Buckley v. Valeo in 1976. He offers information on the statutory limitations on independent campaign expenditures justified by interests in...

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...

  • J. SKELLY WRIGHT'S DEMOCRATIC FIRST AMENDMENT. Kalb, Johanna // Loyola Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p107 

    An essay is presented on Justice J. Skelly Wright's opinion in a court case Buckley v. Valeo as a judge of the Circuit Court, and on first democratic amendment in the constitution related to campaign funding. Topics discussed include criticism made by Wright on the United States Supreme Court's...

  • Real Campaign Reform. Jaffe, Erik S.; Levy, Robert A. // Regulation;Fall2002, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p8 

    Examines the role of the Buckley versus Valeo Supreme Court case, which allowed political speech in the form of campaign contributions and expression of election advocacy, on campaign reforms in the U.S. Plaintiffs of the case; Question over recognizing money as protected speech; Problems...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics