TITLE

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Single Anastomosis (Mini-) Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial and Study of Incretin Effect

AUTHOR(S)
Lee, Wei-Jei; Chong, Keong; Lin, Yu-Hung; Wei, Jih-Hua; Chen, Shu-Chun
PUB. DATE
September 2014
SOURCE
Obesity Surgery;Sep2014, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p1552
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Bariatric surgery may be beneficial in mildly obese patients with poorly controlled diabetes. The optimal procedure to achieve diabetes remission is unknown. In 2011, we published the short-term results of a pilot study designed to evaluate the efficacy of diabetic control and the role of duodenal exclusion in mildly obese diabetic patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) vs. a laparoscopic single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass (SAGB). This study analyzes the 5-year results and evaluates the incretin effect. Methods: A double-blind randomized trial included 60 participants with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level higher than 7.5 %, a body mass index (BMI) between 25 and 35 Kg/m, a C-peptide level ≥1.0 ng/mL, and a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for at least 6 months. A SAGB with duodenal exclusion or a SG without duodenal exclusion was performed. Results: The 5-year results of the primary outcome were as an intention-to-treat analysis for HbA1c ≤6.5 % without glycemic therapy. Assessments of the incretin effect and β cell function were performed at baseline and between 36 and 60 months. The patients were randomly assigned to SAGB ( n = 30) and SG ( n = 30). At 60 months, 18 participants (60 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 42 to 78 %) in the SAGB group and nine participants (30 %; 95 % CI, 13 to 47 %) in the SG group achieved the primary end points (odds ratio (OR), 0.3; 95 % CI, 0.1 to 0.8 %). The participants assigned to the SAGB procedure had a similar percentage of weight loss as the SG patients (22.8 ± 5.9 vs. 20.1 ± 5.3 %; p > 0.05) but achieved a lower level of HbA1c (6.1 ± 0.7 vs. 7.1 ± 1.2 %; p < 0.05) than the SG patients. There was a significant increase in the incretin effect before and after surgery in both groups, but the SAGB group had a higher incretin effect than the SG group at 5 years. Conclusions: In mildly obese patients with T2DM, SG is effective at improving glycemic control at 5 years, but SAGB was more likely to achieve better glycemic control than SG and had a higher incretin effect compared to SG.
ACCESSION #
97351595

 

Share

Other Topics