TITLE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROMANIAN CASE

AUTHOR(S)
GAVREA, C.; STEGEREAN, R.
PUB. DATE
January 2012
SOURCE
Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society;2012, Issue 3, p179
SOURCE TYPE
Conference Proceeding
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the impact of board characteristics (board size, CEO duality, board diversity-gender and age and board meetings) as corporate governance variables on organizational performance. Based on the existing literature we developed five hypotheses in order to analyze the relationship between board characteristics and organizational performance. Our results show a significant and negative impact of board size on firm performance which validates our first hypothesis. The second hypothesis is validated only when ROE is used as a performance measure. The third hypothesis (H3) and fourth hypothesis (H4) are not validated for neither of the two models which means that gender and age diversity do not have a significant impact on the financial results of the sampled firms. The last hypothesis is validated only when ROE is used to measure the firm performance
ACCESSION #
97821249

 

Related Articles

  • An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Mechanisms, CEO Characteristics and Listed Companies' Performance. Vintilă, Georgeta; Gherghina, Ştefan Cristian // International Business Research;Oct2012, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p175 

    This paper examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms and CEO characteristics on U.S. listed companies' performance. The corporate governance mechanisms are: shareholdings of insiders, shareholdings of the institutional investors and mutual funds, board size and the number of...

  • The Board vs Executive View of Board Effectiveness and its Influence on Organisational Performance. Mowbray, Denis // Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership;2014, p183 

    The robustness of the board review process is proportional to the value a board will gain from conducting the reviews. However, it is rare for a board to either seek or accept as valid, the views of those outside of the board room, particularly, the executive of the organisation. We posit that...

  • Board of Director Contacts and Implications for Firm Performance. Smith, Kevin J. // Annual International Conference on Enterprise Marketing & Global;2015, p137 

    Boards of directors are considered the pinnacle of corporate governance and directors can provide a wealth of knowledge and resonrces to the companies they serve. Personal connections among company directors are regarded as an important phenomenon which can be used to access and mobilise...

  • Give shareholders vote to improve returns, board performance. Lane, Marc J. // Crain's Chicago Business;7/24/2006, Vol. 29 Issue 30, p18 

    The article presents the author's views on the importance of voting rights of shareholders to improve investment returns and to enhance the performance of board of directors. He views that under the prevailing corporate governance system, directors are not accountable to the shareholders whose...

  • Effects of Selected Corporate Governance Characteristics on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Kenya. Ongore, Vincent O.; K'Obonyo, Peter O. // International Journal of Economics & Financial Issues (IJEFI);Sep2011, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p99 

    This paper examines the interrelations among ownership, board and manager characteristics and firm performance in a sample of 54 firms listed at the Nairobi Stock Exchange (NSE). These governance characteristics, designed to minimize agency problems between principals and agents are...

  • The 2013 acceleration of 'operational' activism. MADDEN, JOHN // Directors & Boards;2013 Fourth Quarter, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p36 

    The article focuses on the author's views about the emergence of operational activism in corporate governance in the U.S. in 2013. The factors influencing operational activism are highlighted which include the attitudes of institutional investors, investment returns and the availability of...

  • Is your board really looking after shareholders' interests? ISAAC, GEORGE // Directors & Boards;2014 4th Quarter, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p37 

    The article discusses aspects of corporate board's responsibility and oversight role of protecting of protecting the interests of the shareholders. It talks about the inevitable consequences of unrealized shareholder's return on equity (ROE), and how to implement a strategy for wealth...

  • Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: A Case study of Karachi Stock Market. Khatab, Humera; Masood, Maryam; Zaman, Khalid; Saleem, Sundas; Saeed, Bilal // International Journal of Trade, Economics & Finance;Feb2011, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p39 

    This paper seeks to investigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm's performance of twenty firms listed at Karachi Stock Exchange. The performance of corporate governance is analyzed through Tobin's Q, while performance of the firms is measured by return on assets (ROA) and...

  • Corporate Governance as Correlate for Firm Performance: A Pooled OLS Investigation of Selected Nigerian Banks. Onakoya, Adegbemi Babatunde O.; Fasanya, Ismail O.; Ofoegbu, Donald Ikenna // IUP Journal of Corporate Governance;Jan2014, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p7 

    The theoretical obligation of the managers in the agency theory is to safeguard the interest of the shareholders, and this study is targeted at investigating the impact of corporate governance on the performance of nine selected banks in Nigeria. The study performs a pooled Ordinary Least Square...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics