TITLE

Enhanced services could be flashpoint for some practices

AUTHOR(S)
Graham, James
PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Pulse;5/5/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the implications of enhanced medical services for the occurrence of partnership disputes among physicians in Great Britain. Provision of enhanced medical services such as minor surgery and treatment of drug misusers; Problems in providing optional services; Implications for medical care.
ACCESSION #
9842029

 

Related Articles

  • Workload and risk force GP to quit.  // Pulse;5/5/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 18, p8 

    Relates that British physician, Tony Hall-Jones is being forced to quit his general practitioner specialist post because of the workload and legal implications of the new contract for enhanced service providers. Career background; Medical defense subscriptions; Implications for medical practice.

  • GPs criticise OOH 'hand-backs'  // Pulse;8/16/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 33, p2 

    Reports on complaints by general practitioners that out-of-hours organizations are handing urgent medical cases back to practices rather than dealing with them.

  • What exactly makes you a good GP? Rowe, Dorothy // Pulse;1/26/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p52 

    Discusses what makes general practitioners good at their job. Differentiation between good practitioners and those who are not; Definition of the idea that good general practitioners take interest in people; Requirements for practitioners in understanding their patient.

  • GPs won't be outsmarted quite so easily.  // Pulse;2/9/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 6, p24 

    Comments on the remarks made by a leading British Department of Health minister gloating that general practitioners have been fooled and outmaneuvered by the contract on general medical services. Positive adoption approach taken by general practitioners on the contract; Independence of general...

  • No more contract votes.  // Pulse;3/22/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 12, p18 

    Reports that local medical communities (LMC) unanimously rejected a call for general practitioners (GP) in Great Britain to be able to vote again on the general medical services contract because it is not similar to the deal they originally accepted. GPC Wales chair, Doctor Andrew Dearden's...

  • Core list gives power to say No.  // Pulse;6/28/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 26, p23 

    Comments on the importance of the task of General Practitioner Committee (GPC) negotiators in Great Britain in drawing up a comprehensive list of essential work done by GPs. Argument that primary care organizations are exploiting the numerous gray areas in the contract to coerce GPs into...

  • Nasty letter from a consultant. Wynne-Jones, Melanie // Pulse;6/28/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 26, p56 

    Advises general practitioners in Great Britain to think matters through carefully and avoid knee-jerk reactions when receiving a nasty letter from a consultant. Need to check on the goal of the letter; Importance of reviewing one's own actions; Deciding on whether any reply is warranted.

  • Six months in, how is it going?  // Pulse;10/4/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 39, p12 

    Focuses on how general practitioners in Great Britain are dealing with the demand of the contract. Rural general practitioner; Urban GP; Dispensing GP; Commuter-belt GP.

  • Do not expect GPs to be all things to all men.  // Nursing Standard;10/31/2007, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p26 

    The article focuses on the issue concerning the service of general practitioners (GP), who has the ability to provide continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care in Great Britain. It stated that people want their chosen doctor as their ideal service at a convenient time and place instead of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics