TITLE

MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION AS A PRE-REQUISITE FOR LEGAL GENDER RECOGNITION

AUTHOR(S)
Dunne, Peter
PUB. DATE
November 2014
SOURCE
Cambridge Law Journal;Nov2014, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p506
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
IN Hämäläinen v Finland (Application no. 37359/09), 16 July 2014, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held that Contracting States of the Council of Europe may require the dissolution of an existing marriage before extending the right to legal gender recognition.
ACCESSION #
99767038

 

Related Articles

  • COMPLIANCE OF UKRAINIAN LAW AND PRACTICE WITH ARTICLE 5 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. Vakulenko, Anastasia // Human Rights Law Review;Jan2004, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p77 

    This article discusses Ukraine's admission into the Council of Europe, highlighting its difficulties complying with Article Five of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR). Topics include a survey of Ukrainian case law heard by the European...

  • Clifford Chance's fight for Chagos Islanders fails in ECHR. Harris, Joanne // Lawyer (Online Edition);1/3/2013, p9 

    The article offers information on the ruling passed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the government of Great Britain by the Chagos Islanders are refused in Great Britain. It mentions that in 2002, islanders launched the litigation against Attorney General, Justice Ouseley. It...

  • EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.  // Europe: A Concise Encyclopedia;2004, p90 

    Information on the "European Court of Human Rights," is presented. The Court accepts a case only when national remedies are not possible and does not have independent powers of enforcement. The Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, is an adjunct of the Council of Europe and is unrelated...

  • Case Commentaries. Pattenden, Rosemary // International Journal of Evidence & Proof;Mar2009, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p58 

    The article presents information on the case Gäfgen v Germany. It is stated that the decision made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in this case about the admissibility of evidence tainted by a violation of Article 3 is important. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human...

  • Case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. The United KingdomEuropean Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section) Judgment. Early, Lawrence; Garlicki, Lech // International Journal of Refugee Law;May2012, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p294 

    The article focuses on the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom. It mentions that the court found violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which prohibits ill-treatment...

  • APPLICATION OF THE RESOLUTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE GENERAL JURISDICTION COURTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. Hvichayevich, Ananiyev Akaky // Society: Politics, Economics, Law;2013, Issue 3, p1 

    This article reviews how the general jurisdiction courts apply the Resolutions of the European Court of Human Rights and European Convention on Human Rights when executing the criminal proceedings. The undertaken research shows the development level of the criminal procedure in Russia in the...

  • ‘Diagnostics’—a Judgment Applying the Convention of Human Rights to the Field of Competition. Oliver, Peter // Journal of European Competition Law & Practice;Apr2012, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p163 

    In this case, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) dismissed a claim that the system of judicial review of decisions of the Italian Competition Authority was incompatible with Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

  • FAMOUS CASES WHICH CONFIRMED THE RIGHT TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ON NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LEVELS. COBZARU, ANGELICA // Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice;2013, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p400 

    Fundamental human right to a healthy environment is part of the latest human rights, also called generation "solidarity rights," which stated largely in the European Court of Human Rights. The starting point is the Article 8, paragraph 1, of the European Convention on privacy and family life, so...

  • Anderson v United Kingdom.  // EG: Estates Gazette;2/20/2010, Issue 1007, p100 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the European Court of Human Rights had allowed the application for damages for breach of right to fair trial, pursuant to Article 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In Anderson v. United Kingdom, the applicant challenged the statutory...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics