TITLE

A Striking Repudiation of "Intelligent Design"

PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p31
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The article comments on the decision of U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III on the case concerning intelligent design in Pennsylvania. The judge found that intelligent design violated the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking supernatural causation and by making assertions that could not be tested or proved wrong. Moreover, ID has not gained acceptance in the scientific community, has not been supported by peer-reviewed research, and has not generated a research and testing program of its own.
ACCESSION #
22644583

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics