TITLE

A dangerous myth

AUTHOR(S)
Goen, Richard L.
PUB. DATE
January 1980
SOURCE
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan1980, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p63
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The article presents the author's comment on the special report, "What the results of a nuclear war would be," in the September 1979 issue of the "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists." According to the author, numerous detailed studies have shown that sufficient food production, industrial, and transportation capability would survive a massive nuclear attack on the U.S. by Soviet Union to permit the continued survival of the remaining population and the recovery of the economy.
ACCESSION #
24226987

 

Related Articles

  • Preventing doomsday. Daley, Michael J. // Odyssey;Jan96, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p29 

    Presents information on `The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' publication and why scientists felt responsible for creating the publication. Implication of an atomic war; Why nations seek to acquire nuclear weapons; Information on the scientists' movement to prevent atomic war; Comments from...

  • Letters. Vinogradov, Michael; Ryabikhin, Leonid; Miller, Bruce; Wales, Jane; Petnuch, Mark; McAdams, Rich; Ikeda, Daisaku; Gunter, Paul; Smith III, William Wharton // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug2008, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p6 

    Several letters to the editor are presented in response to the articles published in the March to April 2008 issue including "Consensual Security" by John Steinbruner, "A Nuclear-Weapon-Free Arctic" by Michael D. Wallace, and "Making Nuclear Energy Work" by Robert Roser.

  • A warning-not a prophecy. Feld, Bernard T. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jun1982, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p2 

    The article focuses on the aims and achievements of the journal "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists," since its founding in 1945. The Bulletin has been representing well the "conscience of the international scientific community" for the last 37 years. The prime concern of the Bulletin has always...

  • A warning-not a prophecy. Feld, Bernard T. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jun1982, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p2 

    The article focuses on the aims and achievements of the journal "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists," since its founding in 1945. The Bulletin has been representing well the "conscience of the international scientific community" for the last 37 years. The prime concern of the Bulletin has always...

  • Nearer to Doomsday.  // Time;9/2/1974, Vol. 104 Issue 10, p102 

    The article reports on the imminence of a nuclear holocaust recorded by the September 1974 issue of "The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists." It mentions the move of the periodical's editors after the signing of the first nuclear arms limitation pact between the U.S. and Soviet Union. It states...

  • 30 years ago in the Bulletin.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1993, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p6 

    Considers an article by `Bulletin' Editor-in-Chief Eugene Rabinowitch in the April 1963 issue concerning a series of bloodthirsty speeches made by Soviet generals and admirals, and even Khrushchev himself, on what they would do to the US in case of an American invasion of Cuba. Ratification of...

  • 40 years ago...  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep1993, Vol. 49 Issue 7, p6 

    Recalls that in the September 1953 issue of the `Bulletin,' the editors noted that following a report from the Soviet Union on a successful test of a hydrogen bomb, the hands of the `Bulletin' clock were moved forward to two minutes to midnight. Comments from editor Eugene Rabinowitch in the...

  • The bulletin of the atomic scientists. Styer, Michael // Foreign Policy;Fall97, Issue 108, p170 

    Presents a summary of `The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,' issued on July/August of 1997 in Chicago. Argument on the agreements reached by the United States and Russia on antiballistic missile systems; Possibility of a Northeast Asian race-for-the-bomb; Information about how arms exports...

  • The end is nigh.  // New Scientist;12/16/95, Vol. 148 Issue 2008, p11 

    Reports that when the `Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' moved its doomsday clock nearer to midnight, nuclear annihilation came a little closer. What board of directors voted for; Subscribers' poll; Arms trade booming.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics