TITLE

LET COMMON SENSE PREVAIL

AUTHOR(S)
Franz, Wanda
PUB. DATE
June 2008
SOURCE
National Right to Life News;Jun2008, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court on the cases Roe versus Wade and Doe versus Bolton, which both involved abortion. She states that the decisions invented a new constitutional right to abortion and argues that the decisions are poorly reasoned and lack a constitutional justification. She claims that the decision in Doe provided abortionists with professional stature. She points out that the industry of abortion has been devastatingly productive with at least 50 million unborn babies killed since 1973.
ACCESSION #
32780797

 

Related Articles

  • LOOK AT THE PRO-LIFE GAINS NOW IS THE TIME TO DEFEND THEM. FRANZ, WANDA // National Right to Life News;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 36 Issue 7/8, p3 

    The article discusses the issue regarding the Roe v. Wade pro-abortion law and changing women's attitude about abortion in the U.S. Under Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that abortion is a constitutional right which can only be removed by the Court itself or by a constitutional...

  • ABORTING ROE: JANE ROE QUESTIONS THE VIABILITY OF ROE V. WADE. Adams, Andrew A. // Texas Review of Law & Politics;Spring2005, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p325 

    Discusses a movement aimed at overturning the U.S. Supreme Court decision on Roe v. Wade that founded abortion rights in the U.S. and held unconstitutional any state restriction on access to abortion. Arguments against the decision; Support for the movement; Summary of the landmark decision that...

  • BRIDGING THE GREAT DIVIDE-A RESPONSE TO LINDA GREENHOUSE AND REVA B. SIEGEL'S BEFORE (AND AFTER) ROE V. WADE: NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT BACKLASH. Inniss, Lolita Buckner // Washington University Law Review;2012, Vol. 89 Issue 4, p963 

    The author discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade, which includes action related to the issue of abortion. She suggests an additional inquiry focusing on implications of abortion and its relation to social, political and cultural conflicts both before and after Roe. She reflects race...

  • Plurality Now Says Roe V. Wade Is Wrong On When Baby's A Baby. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;8/4/2015, pA12 

    The article offers information on the public opinion poll conducted by the periodical "Investor's Business Daily (IBD)" and consulting services firm TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics (TIPP) regarding the 1973 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on making abortion legal. It mentions...

  • Roe: Twenty-Five Years Later.  // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Jan1998, Issue 79, p9 

    Describes the outcome of the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision on the case Roe versus Wade which concerns the legalization of abortion in the country. Reflection of the court decision on the Supreme Court; Reaction of pro-abortionists and anti-abortionists on the court decision; Views of the...

  • Bedroom v. Courtroom.  // Bulletin with Newsweek;11/15/2005, Vol. 123 Issue 6496, p52 

    This article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade. It is the dissent in which Judge Samuel Alito ruled that it was not an undue burden for a married woman to be obliged to notify her husband that she was having an abortion. Within hours of the nomination of Alito to the Supreme...

  • World without Roe? Heim, David // Christian Century;8/9/2005, Vol. 122 Issue 16, p8 

    Asserts the possible implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling regarding the case Roe versus Wade for abortion laws. Role of the government in regulating abortion; Opposition of Protestant groups to the legality of abortion; Practical and political advantages of abortion laws to liberals.

  • The Burger Course.  // National Review;8/9/1985, Vol. 37 Issue 15, p18 

    Reports that the United States Department of Justice has filed a petition to the Supreme Court to reverse its ruling in Roe v. Wade in 1973. Nullification of conservative, restrictive and liberal laws; Implications of a reveral of Supreme Court decision; Reason why the Supreme Court may reject...

  • Abortion on the Line.  // National Review;8/4/1989, Vol. 41 Issue 14, p12 

    This article presents information on the Supreme Court's decision in the Roe v. Wade case. The Justices have created a new order by chipping away at Roe v. Wade and restoring to the states some measure of legislative authority over abortion. The new order has some uncertainties with potential...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics