TITLE

AMENDMENTS

PUB. DATE
August 1936
SOURCE
America;8/29/1936, Vol. 55 Issue 21, p493
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author discusses the need to amend the U.S. Constitution as suggested by campaign managers. The Constitution reportedly authorizes them and prescribes the method of amendment. The author suggests that while changes are necessary or useful, it should reportedly be done openly and through constitutional methods.
ACCESSION #
35033582

 

Related Articles

  • MAKING CHANGES. Gordon, Dónal Kevin // Cobblestone;Dec2007, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p29 

    The article discusses the process of constitutional amendment as provided in Article V of the U.S. Constitution.

  • CONTEST.  // Current Events;9/21/2009, Vol. 109 Issue 3, p8 

    A contest concerning the proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution by the readers of this journal is presented.

  • AMENDING WITHOUT AMENDMENTS: A CHALLENGE TO THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM. NATSVLISHVILI, VAKHTANG // Constitutional Law Review;Jul2015, Issue 8, p30 

    No abstract available.

  • Is the Constitution Out of Date? Reidinger, Paul // ABA Journal;Sep87, Vol. 73 Issue 9, p52 

    Interviews several legal academics on the issue of whether the 200-year old United States Constitution is in need of amending. Aspects of the constitution that need updating; Social and political problems that need to be addressed should the constitution adopt changes.

  • Sociology. BLAKELY, PAUL L. // America;8/31/1935, Vol. 53 Issue 21, p493 

    The author focuses on the Norkis plan to amend the U.S. Constitution in 1935. He critiques the plan to change the majority vote ruling to three to sustain an Act of Congress in conflict with the Ten Amendments or Acts of State legislatures in conflict with guarantees of the Federal Constitution....

  • AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION.  // America;12/19/1936, Vol. 56 Issue 11, p253 

    The authors call for the amendment of the U.S. constitution. They concur with Arizona Senator Ashurst's view that if the economic and industrial policies inaugurated in 1933, and cut down by the Supreme Court, are to be resumed, the Constitution must be amended. The authors argue that the...

  • Constitutional reboot. Levatter, Ross // Liberty (08941408);Aug2009, Vol. 23 Issue 7, p20 

    The author comments on the reverence people give to the U.S. Constitution. He expresses amazement at this reverence even if people have not read it, or do not really understand it. He suspects that the reverence is directed to the name although it is obviously not the same document signed in...

  • The Community Caretaker Doctrine: Yet Another Fourth Amendment Exception. Naumann, Mary Elisabeth // American Journal of Criminal Law;Spring99, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p325 

    Analyzes the community caretaker doctrine in criminal law based in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Examination of the development of the doctrine; Views on whether the use of the doctrine implicates the Fourth Amendment; Application of the doctrine at both the federal and state...

  • AFTERWORD: FULL OF SOUND AND FURY BUT SIGNIFIYING RELATIVELY LITTLE? Levinson, Sanford // Tennessee Law Review;Spring2011, Vol. 78 Issue 3, p867 

    An afterword to "Tennessee Law Review" is presented.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics