TITLE

Evolution vs. Creation

AUTHOR(S)
Donnelly, Matt
PUB. DATE
April 2018
SOURCE
Evolution vs. Creation -- Research Starters Education;4/1/2018, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Research Starter
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
This article discusses the legal issues surrounding the teaching of creationism and evolution in public school science classrooms in the United States. Since the early 20th century, parents, teachers, and politicians have often been embroiled in contentious debates regarding freedom of religion as applied to the role of religious interpretations of science in the public school science curriculum. Religious fundamentalists view evolution as both unscientific and amoral and advocate its replacement with a faith-based account of the origin of man. Others accept that evolution is fundamental to science and therefore important for students to study. The courts have consistently ruled that creationism and, later, Intelligent Design are not science and therefore do not belong in the public school science classroom.
ACCESSION #
27170114

 

Related Articles

  • What is wrong with intelligent design? Dawes, Gregory // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2007, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p69 

    While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely “specified complexity” (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the...

  • Intelligent Design: Scientific Theory or Religious Conviction? Greenawalt, Kent // Journal of Church & State;Spring2003, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p237 

    Analyzes the religious and scientific aspects of the theory of intelligent design. Comparison between Darwin's evolution theory and the creation theory; Evidence which support the theory; Inferences of intelligent design theory; Issues on teaching religion.

  • "Intelligent Design": A Lamb in Wolf's Clothing. Dobson, Geoffrey // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p34 

    The article presents the author's comments on intelligent design (ID) practices. He criticized ID advocates who claim that ID should be taught in the science classroom as an alternative to the theory of natural selection. He explained why ID advocates particularly focus on scientist Chales...

  • Intelligent design theory belongs in the science classroom. Betty, Stafford // National Catholic Reporter;10/21/2005, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p23 

    Focuses on the stands of the author about the issue of introducing intelligent design in public schools in the U.S. Assertion that intelligent design theory belongs in the science classroom; Favorableness of the author on the issue of integrating intelligent design in public schools; Association...

  • Intelligent Science. Smith, Leland L.; Watson Sr., Timothy F.; Ross, Kelley L.; Seitz, Russell; Witt, Amanda; Doyle, Jerry // American Spectator;Sep2005, Vol. 38 Issue 7, p6 

    Presents letters to the editor in response to the article "The Little Engine That Could… Undo Darwinism," which argued on the use of intelligent design (ID) as an alternative to teaching Darwinian evolution in school science classes in the U.S., published in the June 2005 issue of the "The...

  • Immunology in the spotlight at the Dover 'Intelligent Design' trial. Bottaro, Andrea; Inlay, Matt A.; Matzke, Nicholas J. // Nature Immunology;May2006, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p433 

    The article reflects on the issue regarding the introduction of intelligent design in a biology class in one of the public schools in the U.S. Several government agencies and religious institutions, assisted with scientific support by the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit...

  • Preserving the sanctity of science. Sares, Ted // New Hampshire Business Review;4/28/2006, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p20 

    The article comments on a court ruling in April 2006 that prohibited a public school district in Pennsylvania from teaching intelligent design in biology classes. The federal judge ruled that the concept of intelligent design is actually creationism in disguise. A debate among educational...

  • TEACHING ABOUT: Origins. Hardy, Lawrence // American School Board Journal;Nov2005, Vol. 192 Issue 11, p26 

    This article explains the rationale behind the intelligent design theory. Courts have repeatedly ruled that teaching creationism in public schools is an unconstitutional promotion of a religious viewpoint. In response, new guises for old ideas have been invented. Creationism began as biblical...

  • Intelligent design trial ends.  // National Catholic Reporter;11/18/2005, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p3 

    Reports that the six weeks federal trial over a school district's policy on intelligent design has ended with both sides claiming victory on the issue of how science should be taught in public schools in Dover, Pennsylvania.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics