TITLE

The Free Speech Jurisprudence of the Rehnquist Court

PUB. DATE
October 1991
SOURCE
Free Speech Yearbook;1991, Vol. 29, p83
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay is presented on free speech jurisprudence under the leadership of U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist during his 1988-1989 and 1989-1990 U.S. Supreme Court terms. The author states that those observers who criticized Rehnquist Court's jurisprudence for cutting back on individual rights have qualified their criticism by saying that free speech has fared well. She says that Rehnquist Court's free speech decisions became significant on judicial process.
ACCESSION #
76237990

 

Related Articles

  • MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY IN A FEDERALIST SYSTEM: THE LATE CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Engelken, Sheri J. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2007, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p695 

    The article focuses on the late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist who, according to the author, is probably best remembered for the many opinions in which he found no protection afforded by the First Amendment. The author examines cases in which Rehnquist authored an opinion...

  • Bad Tendencies: The Rehnquist Court and Sexually Explicit Expression.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1997, Vol. 35, p73 

    An essay is presented on arguments regarding the subordination by Rehnquist Court on the freedom of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment to an ill-defined consideration of traditional values. It explores the rulings in the case of Glen Theatre and Indiana-based Barnes Court, where U.S. Chief...

  • Dancing with Wolves: Nudity, Morality, and the Speech/Conduct Doctrine.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1994, Vol. 32, p86 

    An essay is presented on the use by U.S. Supreme Court of speech/conduct dichotomy and public morality limitation in examining the case between Barnes and Glen Theatre Inc. It states that the case deals with the court's approval of nude dancing. Moreover, U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist...

  • Recovering the Freedom of Speech. Haun, William J. // National Affairs;Winter2016, Vol. 26, p82 

    This article focuses on the Freedom of Speech Clause in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Topics covered include the failure of conservatives to recover the founders' notion of protected speech in the Free Speech Clause, the dominant jurisprudence on the Supreme Court with regards to...

  • IMAGINARY THREATS TO GOVERNMENT'S EXPRESSIVE INTERESTS. Norton, Helen // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1265 

    The article discusses the exemption of the government's own speech from the free speech clause scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court. It highlights the importance of government expression which enables members of the public to identify the priorities of the government. It emphasizes the court case...

  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT DEGRADED: MILKOVICH V. LORAIN AND A CONTINUING SENSE OF LOSS ON ITS 20TH BIRTHDAY. WEISBERG, RICHARD H. // South Carolina Law Review;Autumn2010, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p157 

    The article discusses the implications of the Supreme Court decision in the case Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. for key First Amendment principles in the U.S. In the case, Chief Justice William Rehnquist held that defendants to defamation actions would not be protected by finding that their...

  • To DEFER OR NOT TO DEFER? DEFERENCE AND ITS DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN THE ROBERTS COURT. Calvert, Clay; Hayes, Justin B. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 63 Issue 1, p13 

    The article presents information on the concept of deference in context with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which protects the rights of individuals to freedom of speech under the Roberts Court which refers to the U.S. Supreme Court. It also mentions about disagreements among the...

  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT'S EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEM. Horwitz, Paul // Washington Law Review;Jun2012, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p445 

    The article discusses U.S. Constitution First Amendment jurisprudence as of June 2012, focusing on several trends involving First Amendment protections including the U.S. Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in the United States v. Alvarez Stolen Valor Act case, as well as questions about...

  • Content and Viewpoint Neutrality: How Fundamental Tenets of First Amendment Law Have Come to be Plagued by Inconsistency and Confusion. Kozlowski, Dan V. // Free Speech Yearbook;2006-2009, Vol. 43, p50 

    The article discusses the criticality of the content- and viewpoint-based speech regulations under the U.S. First Amendment jurisprudence. It states that the Supreme Court has not defined a viewpoint discrimination in cases judged by Justice Warren Burger. According to justice Lewis Powell, the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics